IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pelli, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schleske, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pelli, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Schleske, M. M.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 26, 751-763, Copyright © 1985 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Psychophysics of reading. III. A fiberscope low-vision reading aid

DG Pelli, GE Legge and MM Schleske

Existing reading aids providing magnification in excess of 6X (24 diopters) are awkward to use, expensive, or not portable. The authors have developed a new type of reading aid, a low-resolution fiberscope, that provides magnification up to 40X (160 diopters), and is easy to use, inexpensive, and portable. The fiberscope consists of an objective- lens assembly, a flexible bundle of optical fibers, and an eyepiece that together transmit an image from the page to the reader's eye. Complete construction details are included. The design is based on the authors' previous findings that reading requires a field of only four characters and a resolution of only 2 cycles/character. After only half an hour of training, a diverse group of low-vision readers read with the fiberscope at rates between 12 and 95 words/minute. Low-vision readers with central field loss had a median reading rate of only 18 words/min, whereas those with intact central fields had a median reading rate of 67 words/min, not far short of the median rate of 73 words/min for normal readers using the fiberscope. This is consistent with the authors' previous findings that low-vision readers with central field loss read much more slowly than those with intact central fields, even when optimal magnification is provided. The authors conclude that the fiberscope may be very useful as an inexpensive portable reading aid for people requiring high magnification.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology