IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moss, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moss, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Klein, B. E.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Vol 30, 823-828, Copyright © 1989 by Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology


ARTICLES AND REPORTS

Are seven standard photographic fields necessary for classification of diabetic retinopathy?

SE Moss, SM Meuer, R Klein, LD Hubbard, RJ Brothers and BE Klein
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.

Stereoscopic fundus photography of seven fields has become standard procedure for detecting diabetic retinopathy. However, the question has arisen as to whether adequate detection of retinopathy can be achieved with fewer fields. This question was investigated in a population-based study of 2694 diabetic persons. Retinopathy levels derived from the detailed grading of all seven fields were compared with those derived from combinations of two, three or four fields, the data for these being selected from the grading of the full seven fields. For eight retinopathy levels, the rate of agreement with seven fields ranges from 80% for two fields to 91% for four fields. For four retinopathy levels, agreement increases to 85 to 95%. The rate of agreement also varies with the specific retinopathy level, with level 65 being especially sensitive to the number of fields. The sensitivity of two to four fields compared to seven fields for detecting any retinopathy varies from 87 to 95%. For detecting proliferative retinopathy, sensitivity varies from 74 to 90%, and for Diabetic Retinopathy Study high-risk characteristics, it varies from 81 to 91%. Analysis of two groups of 50 eyes in which the combinations of fields were graded independently shows a small but nonsignificant effect of field overlap. These results indicate that in some situations, fewer fields may be adequate.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiol
Modern-Day Clinical Course of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus After 30 Years' Duration: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications and Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Experience (1983-2005)
Arch Intern Med, July 27, 2009; 169(14): 1307 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
X. R. Duan, Y. B. Liang, D. S. Friedman, L. P. Sun, W. B. Wei, J. J. Wang, G. L. Wang, W. Liu, Q. S. Tao, N. L. Wang, et al.
Prevalence and Associations of Epiretinal Membranes in a Rural Chinese Adult Population: The Handan Eye Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 2018 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
M. C. Leske, S.-Y. Wu, A. Hennis, B. Nemesure, A. P. Schachat, L. Hyman, L. Yang, and for the Barbados Eye Study Group
Nine-year incidence of diabetic retinopathy in the barbados eye studies.
Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 2006; 124(2): 250 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. H. Scanlon, C. Foy, R. Malhotra, and S. J. Aldington
The Influence of Age, Duration of Diabetes, Cataract, and Pupil Size on Image Quality in Digital Photographic Retinal Screening
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2005; 28(10): 2448 - 2453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Rema, S. Premkumar, B. Anitha, R. Deepa, R. Pradeepa, and V. Mohan
Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Urban India: The Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES) Eye Study, I
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2328 - 2333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Fraser-Bell, M. Ying-Lai, R. Klein, and R. Varma
Prevalence and Associations of Epiretinal Membranes in Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1732 - 1736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
The Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy Among Adults in the United States
Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2004; 122(4): 552 - 563.



Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
P H Scanlon, R Malhotra, R H Greenwood, S J Aldington, C Foy, M Flatman, and S Downes
Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy
Br J Ophthalmol, October 1, 2003; 87(10): 1258 - 1263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
G L Ong, L G Ripley, R S B Newsom, and A G Casswell
Assessment of colour vision as a screening test for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy before loss of vision
Br J Ophthalmol, June 1, 2003; 87(6): 747 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
H. A. van Leiden, J. M. Dekker, A. C. Moll, G. Nijpels, R. J. Heine, L. M. Bouter, C. D.A. Stehouwer, and B. C.P. Polak
Blood Pressure, Lipids, and Obesity Are Associated With Retinopathy: The Hoorn Study
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2002; 25(8): 1320 - 1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
F. Moller, M. Hansen, and A. K. Sjolie
Is One 60{degrees} Fundus Photograph Sufficient for Screening of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy?
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2001; 24(12): 2083 - 2085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. K. Hoogeveen, P. J. Kostense, P. E. D. Eysink, B. C. P. Polak, P. J. Beks, C. Jakobs, J. M. Dekker, G. Nijpels, R. J. Heine, L. M. Bouter, et al.
Hyperhomocysteinemia Is Associated With the Presence of Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Hoorn Study
Arch Intern Med, October 23, 2000; 160(19): 2984 - 2990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
M. Rema, R. Deepa, and V. Mohan
Prevalence of retinopathy at diagnosis among type 2 diabetic patients attending a diabetic centre in south India
Br J Ophthalmol, September 1, 2000; 84(9): 1058 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
R. McKay, C. A McCarty, and H. R Taylor
Diabetic retinopathy in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project
Br J Ophthalmol, August 1, 2000; 84(8): 865 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
L. Dandona, R. Dandona, T. J Naduvilath, C. A McCarty, and G. N Rao
Population based assessment of diabetic retinopathy in an urban population in southern India
Br J Ophthalmol, August 1, 1999; 83(8): 937 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
T. Yu, P. Mitchell, G. Berry, W. Li, and J. J. Wang
Retinopathy in Older Persons Without Diabetes and Its Relationship to Hypertension
Arch Ophthalmol, January 1, 1998; 116(1): 83 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Mitchell, J. J. Wang, W. Li, S. R. Leeder, and W. Smith
Prevalence of Asymptomatic Retinal Emboli in an Australian Urban Community
Stroke, January 1, 1997; 28(1): 63 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
P. Mitchell, W. Smith, and A. Chang
Prevalence and Associations of Retinal Vein Occlusion in Australia: The Blue Mountains Eye Study
Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 1996; 114(10): 1243 - 1247.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
A. P. Schachat, L. Hyman, M. C. Leske, A. M. S. Connell, C. Hiner, N. Javornik, J. Alexander, and Barbados (West Indies) Eye Study Group
Comparison of Diabetic Retinopathy Detection by Clinical Examinations and Photograph Gradings
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 1993; 111(8): 1064 - 1070.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology