HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wilson, J. R. Articles by Boothe, R. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilson, J. R. Articles by Boothe, R. G.

Asymmetric Responses in Cortical Visually Evoked Potentials to Motion Are Not Derived from Eye Movements

¹ From the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Departments of Cell Biology, Psychology, and Ophthalmology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; ² Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California; and ³ Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Texas, Galveston.

Abstract

PURPOSE. Normal neonates and many adults after abnormal visual development have directional preferences for visual stimulus motions; i.e., they give better responses for optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and visually evoked potentials (VEPs) in one direction than to those in the opposite direction. The authors tested whether the VEP responses were asymmetrical because of abnormal eye movements.

METHODS. VEPs were recorded from the visual cortices of five macaque monkeys: one normal, one neonate, and three reared with alternating monocular occlusion (AMO). They were lightly anesthetized, followed by paralysis to prevent eye movements. They then had "jittered" vertical grating patterns presented in their visual fields. The steady state VEPs were analyzed with discrete Fourier transforms to obtain the amplitudes and phases of the asymmetries.

RESULTS. The normal, control monkey had small, insignificant amplitudes of its asymmetrical Fourier component and random phases that were not 180^o out of phase across the left and right eyes. The neonatal monkey and the AMO monkeys all had large, significant asymmetries that were approximately 180^o out of phase between the left and right eyes.

CONCLUSIONS. The neonate and abnormally reared monkeys continued to have asymmetrical responses even after their eyes were paralyzed. Therefore, eye movements cannot be the source of the asymmetrical amplitudes of the VEPs, and the visual cortex is at least one source responsible for asymmetries observed in neonates and adults reared under abnormal visual inputs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. G. Bosworth and E. E. Birch Direction-of-Motion Detection and Motion VEP Asymmetries in Normal Children and Children with Infantile Esotropia Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5523 - 5531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. N. Fu and R. G. Boothe A Psychophysical Measurement and Analysis of Motion Perception in Normal and Binocularly Deprived Monkeys Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2001; 42(11): 2547 - 2553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]