IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bremner, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bremner, F. D.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. E.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1999;40:2528-2534.)
© 1999 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Comparing Pupil Function with Visual Function in Patients with Leber’s Hereditary Optic Neuropathy

Fion D. Bremner, Josephine Shallo–Hoffmann, Paul Riordan–Eva and Stephen E. Smith

From the Department of Neuro-ophthalmology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To compare pupil function with visual function in patients with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and age-matched normal control subjects.

METHODS. Visual function was assessed by measuring the perceptual thresholds at five central locations in the visual field using automated static perimetry. Pupil function was assessed by recording the pupil responses to a standard intensity light stimulus (size equivalent to a Goldmann V target) presented at the same five locations in the visual field. The extent of the pupil afferent defect in LHON patients was quantified by establishing the relationship between stimulus intensity and the size of the pupil response in normal subjects and then interpolating the equivalent luminance deficit in LHON patients from the size of their pupil responses.

RESULTS. At all five locations tested, the pupil responses were significantly reduced in amplitude, and the perceptual thresholds were significantly raised in LHON patients compared with normal control subjects. A nonparametric analysis of perceptual and pupil responses to perithreshold stimuli showed that a stimulus that was not perceived was three times more likely to be followed by a pupil response in a LHON patient than in a normal subject (P < 0.001). A quantitative comparison showed that the visual deficits exceeded the pupil deficits by on average 7.5 dB at all tested locations.

CONCLUSIONS. Although both visual and pupil function are abnormal in LHON, there appears to be relative sparing of the pupil afferent fibers.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JRSMHome page
M S Rajan, F D Bremner, and P Riordan-Eva
Pupil perimetry in the diagnosis of functional visual field loss
J R Soc Med, January 10, 2002; 95(10): 498 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
F. D. Bremner, E. A. Tomlin, J. Shallo–Hoffmann, M. Votruba, and S. E. Smith
The Pupil in Dominant Optic Atrophy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2001; 42(3): 675 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology