|
|
||||||||
1 From the Department of Vision Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom; 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; and 3 Glaucoma Department, Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To determine the within-visit between-algorithm and the within-algorithm between-visit differences in sensitivity for the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, FASTPAC, and Full Threshold algorithms in stable primary open angle glaucoma.
METHODS. One designated eye from each of 29 patients (age 67.3 ± 10.2 years; mean ± SD) experienced in automated perimetry was examined with the four algorithms on each of three visits, using the Humphrey Field Analyzer 750 and Program 30-2.
RESULTS. The group mean Mean Sensitivity was 1.0 dB greater for SITA Standard than Full Threshold (P < 0.001), 0.7 dB greater for SITA Standard than FASTPAC (P < 0.001), 1.6 dB greater for SITA Fast than FASTPAC (P < 0.001), and 0.9 dB greater for SITA Fast than SITA Standard (P < 0.001). The higher pointwise sensitivity for SITA Fast compared to Full Threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA Standard increased with increase in defect depth. The examination duration for SITA Standard was 53% of that for Full Threshold and 50% shorter for SITA Fast compared to FASTPAC (P < 0.001), regardless of age (P = 0.932). The examination duration increased with increase in severity of field loss (P < 0.001), and this increase was proportionately greater for both SITA algorithms (P < 0.001), particularly SITA Fast. The Total and Pattern Deviation probability analyses of both SITA algorithms yielded a statistically greater defect than Full Threshold or FASTPAC (P < 0.001). The within-algorithm between-visit differences were similar between SITA Standard and Full Threshold and between SITA Fast and FASTPAC.
CONCLUSIONS. Both SITA algorithms produce a marginally higher differential light sensitivity compared to existing algorithms but with a statistically deeper defect and a marked reduction in examination duration.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Schiefer, J. P. Pascual, B. Edmunds, E. Feudner, E. M. Hoffmann, C. A. Johnson, W. A. Lagreze, N. Pfeiffer, P. A. Sample, F. Staubach, et al. Comparison of the New Perimetric GATE Strategy with Conventional Full-Threshold and SITA Standard Strategies Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 488 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Friedman, H. D. Jampel, B. Munoz, and S. K. West The Prevalence of Open-angle Glaucoma Among Blacks and Whites 73 Years and Older: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Glaucoma Study. Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2006; 124(11): 1625 - 1630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Musch, B. W. Gillespie, B. M. Motyka, L. M. Niziol, R. P. Mills, P. R. Lichter, and on behalf of the CIGTS Study Group Converting to SITA-Standard from Full-Threshold Visual Field Testing in the Follow-up Phase of a Clinical Trial Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 2755 - 2759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Anderson, C. A. Johnson, M. Fingeret, J. L. Keltner, P. G. D. Spry, M. Wall, and J. S. Werner Characteristics of the Normative Database for the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1540 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wollstein, J. S. Schuman, L. L. Price, A. Aydin, P. C. Stark, E. Hertzmark, E. Lai, H. Ishikawa, C. Mattox, J. G. Fujimoto, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Longitudinal Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2005; 123(4): 464 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bjerre, J. R. Grigg, N. R. A. Parry, and D. B. Henson Test-Retest Variability of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential and SITA Standard Perimetry in Glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 4035 - 4040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. McKendrick and D. R. Badcock Decreased Visual Field Sensitivity Measured 1 Day, Then 1 Week, after Migraine Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1061 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Turpin, A. M. McKendrick, C. A. Johnson, and A. J. Vingrys Properties of Perimetric Threshold Estimates from Full Threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like Strategies, as Determined by Computer Simulation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 4787 - 4795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bengtsson A New Rapid Threshold Algorithm for Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 1388 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gazzard, P. J. Foster, A. C. Viswanathan, J. G. Devereux, F. T. S. Oen, P. T. K. Chew, P. T. Khaw, and S. K. L. Seah The Severity and Spatial Distribution of Visual Field Defects in Primary Glaucoma: A Comparison of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2002; 120(12): 1636 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Budenz, P. Rhee, W. J. Feuer, J. McSoley, C. A. Johnson, and D. R. Anderson Comparison of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Using Standard Full Threshold and Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithms Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2002; 120(9): 1136 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Szatmary, V. Biousse, and N. J. Newman Can Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Fast Perimetry Be Used as an Alternative to Goldmann Perimetry in Neuro-ophthalmic Practice? Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2002; 120(9): 1162 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Turpin, A. M. McKendrick, C. A. Johnson, and A. J. Vingrys Performance of Efficient Test Procedures for Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 709 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Turpin, A. M. McKendrick, C. A. Johnson, and A. J. Vingrys Development of Efficient Threshold Strategies for Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry Using Computer Simulation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 322 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wall, S. G. Punke, T. L. Stickney, C. F. Brito, K. R. Withrow, and R. H. Kardon SITA Standard in Optic Neuropathies and Hemianopias: A Comparison with Full Threshold Testing Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 528 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |