IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wild, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunliffe, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wild, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cunliffe, I. A.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 1999;40:1998-2009.)
© 1999 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

The SITA Perimetric Threshold Algorithms in Glaucoma

John M. Wild12, Ian E. Pacey12, Eamon C. O’Neill3 and Ian A. Cunliffe12,3

1 From the Department of Vision Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom; 2 Department of Ophthalmology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; and 3 Glaucoma Department, Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Abstract

PURPOSE. To determine the within-visit between-algorithm and the within-algorithm between-visit differences in sensitivity for the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, FASTPAC, and Full Threshold algorithms in stable primary open angle glaucoma.

METHODS. One designated eye from each of 29 patients (age 67.3 ± 10.2 years; mean ± SD) experienced in automated perimetry was examined with the four algorithms on each of three visits, using the Humphrey Field Analyzer 750 and Program 30-2.

RESULTS. The group mean Mean Sensitivity was 1.0 dB greater for SITA Standard than Full Threshold (P < 0.001), 0.7 dB greater for SITA Standard than FASTPAC (P < 0.001), 1.6 dB greater for SITA Fast than FASTPAC (P < 0.001), and 0.9 dB greater for SITA Fast than SITA Standard (P < 0.001). The higher pointwise sensitivity for SITA Fast compared to Full Threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA Standard increased with increase in defect depth. The examination duration for SITA Standard was 53% of that for Full Threshold and 50% shorter for SITA Fast compared to FASTPAC (P < 0.001), regardless of age (P = 0.932). The examination duration increased with increase in severity of field loss (P < 0.001), and this increase was proportionately greater for both SITA algorithms (P < 0.001), particularly SITA Fast. The Total and Pattern Deviation probability analyses of both SITA algorithms yielded a statistically greater defect than Full Threshold or FASTPAC (P < 0.001). The within-algorithm between-visit differences were similar between SITA Standard and Full Threshold and between SITA Fast and FASTPAC.

CONCLUSIONS. Both SITA algorithms produce a marginally higher differential light sensitivity compared to existing algorithms but with a statistically deeper defect and a marked reduction in examination duration.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
U. Schiefer, J. P. Pascual, B. Edmunds, E. Feudner, E. M. Hoffmann, C. A. Johnson, W. A. Lagreze, N. Pfeiffer, P. A. Sample, F. Staubach, et al.
Comparison of the New Perimetric GATE Strategy with Conventional Full-Threshold and SITA Standard Strategies
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 488 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
D. S. Friedman, H. D. Jampel, B. Munoz, and S. K. West
The Prevalence of Open-angle Glaucoma Among Blacks and Whites 73 Years and Older: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Glaucoma Study.
Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2006; 124(11): 1625 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. C. Musch, B. W. Gillespie, B. M. Motyka, L. M. Niziol, R. P. Mills, P. R. Lichter, and on behalf of the CIGTS Study Group
Converting to SITA-Standard from Full-Threshold Visual Field Testing in the Follow-up Phase of a Clinical Trial
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 2755 - 2759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. J. Anderson, C. A. Johnson, M. Fingeret, J. L. Keltner, P. G. D. Spry, M. Wall, and J. S. Werner
Characteristics of the Normative Database for the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1540 - 1548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
G. Wollstein, J. S. Schuman, L. L. Price, A. Aydin, P. C. Stark, E. Hertzmark, E. Lai, H. Ishikawa, C. Mattox, J. G. Fujimoto, et al.
Optical Coherence Tomography Longitudinal Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma
Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2005; 123(4): 464 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Bjerre, J. R. Grigg, N. R. A. Parry, and D. B. Henson
Test-Retest Variability of Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential and SITA Standard Perimetry in Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 4035 - 4040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. M. McKendrick and D. R. Badcock
Decreased Visual Field Sensitivity Measured 1 Day, Then 1 Week, after Migraine
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1061 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Turpin, A. M. McKendrick, C. A. Johnson, and A. J. Vingrys
Properties of Perimetric Threshold Estimates from Full Threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like Strategies, as Determined by Computer Simulation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 4787 - 4795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. Bengtsson
A New Rapid Threshold Algorithm for Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 1388 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
G. Gazzard, P. J. Foster, A. C. Viswanathan, J. G. Devereux, F. T. S. Oen, P. T. K. Chew, P. T. Khaw, and S. K. L. Seah
The Severity and Spatial Distribution of Visual Field Defects in Primary Glaucoma: A Comparison of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma
Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2002; 120(12): 1636 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
D. L. Budenz, P. Rhee, W. J. Feuer, J. McSoley, C. A. Johnson, and D. R. Anderson
Comparison of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Using Standard Full Threshold and Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithms
Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2002; 120(9): 1136 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
G. Szatmary, V. Biousse, and N. J. Newman
Can Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm Fast Perimetry Be Used as an Alternative to Goldmann Perimetry in Neuro-ophthalmic Practice?
Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2002; 120(9): 1162 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Turpin, A. M. McKendrick, C. A. Johnson, and A. J. Vingrys
Performance of Efficient Test Procedures for Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 709 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Turpin, A. M. McKendrick, C. A. Johnson, and A. J. Vingrys
Development of Efficient Threshold Strategies for Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry Using Computer Simulation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 322 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Wall, S. G. Punke, T. L. Stickney, C. F. Brito, K. R. Withrow, and R. H. Kardon
SITA Standard in Optic Neuropathies and Hemianopias: A Comparison with Full Threshold Testing
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 528 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology