IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bachmann, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fahle, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bachmann, G.
Right arrow Articles by Fahle, M.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2000;41:2870-2886.)
© 2000 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Component Perimetry: A Fast Method to Detect Visual Field Defects Caused by Brain Lesions

Gudrun Bachmann1 and Manfred Fahle2,3

1 From the Sektion Visuelle Sensorik, Department of Neuro-ophthalmology, University Eye Clinic, Tübingen, Germany; the 2 Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, United Kingdom; and the 3 Institute for Brain Research IV, Human Neurobiology; University of Bremen, Germany.

PURPOSE. Noise field campimetry, performed according to Aulhorn and Köst, confronts patients with a large field of irregularly flickering dots, and many patients immediately perceive their visual field defects. The original method had a somewhat low specificity and sensitivity, especially for patients with visual field defects caused by cortical lesions.

METHODS. The method was improved in two ways. First, the grain of the visual noise was increased toward the periphery of the visual field to accommodate the peripheral decrease in visual acuity. Second, the type of stimulus pattern was varied to include separate investigations of different visual components or functions (color, motion, temporal resolution, line orientation, stereoscopic depth, acuity, and figure–ground segmentation). To evaluate the reliability of the method, the visual fields were compared, as assessed by the new method, with those of conventional perimetry in 41 patients with neurologic disorders and 22 normal control subjects.

RESULTS. The results were encouraging. All patients with suprageniculate lesions subjectively experienced visual field defects in component perimetry. Sizes of visual field defects obtained with both methods corresponded qualitatively with each other, with a highly significant correlation. The specificity of component perimetry was higher than that of the original noise field campimetry.

CONCLUSIONS. This pilot study indicates that component perimetry is a subjective but relatively reliable method for detecting disorders of visual perception caused by lesions at different stages along the visual pathway, permitting fast screening of the visual field. In addition, this method seems to allow examination of the visual field, not only for defects in contrast sensitivity, as does conventional light perimetry, but also for the status of other components of vision such as color or motion perception. Further evaluation with larger patient cohorts is needed to allow exact assessment of the clinical usefulness of the method.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology