IOVS Molecular Human Reproduction
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tamburrelli, C.
Right arrow Articles by Scullica, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tamburrelli, C.
Right arrow Articles by Scullica, L.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2000;41:2960-2966.)
© 2000 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Optic Disc Swelling: Comparison with CSLO in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Ciro Tamburrelli, Tommaso Salgarello, Carmela Grazia Caputo, Andrea Giudiceandrea and Luigi Scullica

From the Institute of Ophthalmology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

PURPOSE. To determine the accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasonographic (US) readings of optic disc elevations in patients with papilledema compared with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (CSLO) measurements.

METHODS. One randomly selected eye of 22 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and a variable degree of optic disc swelling underwent five and three repeated measurements of disc height using high-resolution ultrasonography (Biovision unit; Quantel Medical, Clermont–Ferrand, France) and CSLO (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph [HRT]; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), respectively. The same procedure was assessed in 14 subjects with variable degrees of physiologic optic disc cupping. US and HRT measurements from each group were individually compared with each other to estimate the accuracy of US readings in both disc conditions in comparison with HRT data.

RESULTS. Ultrasonographic readings were positively correlated with HRT measurements in both swollen (r = 0.62, P = 0.002) and excavated disc (r = 0.84, P < 0.0002). The 95% limits of agreement between the instruments were 0.24 ± 0.59 mm (mean ± 2 SD) and 0.05 ± 0.3 mm for swelling and cupping measurements, respectively. The coefficient of variation was 7.63% and 1.8% for swelling and 7.93% and 5.91% for cupping, with US and HRT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS. The results indicate that US and CSLO readings are correlated in both disc swelling and cupping conditions, but to a different extent because of a significant discrepancy in papilledema. US assessment can be considered highly reproducible. Combined US and HRT optic disc analysis may be recommended in papilledema evaluation as long as a better correlation can be demonstrated in further studies.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M Lim, M Kurian, A Penn, D Calver, and J-P Lin
Visual failure without headache in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 206 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology