IOVS Stroke
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maddess, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dobinson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maddess, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dobinson, J.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2000;41:3827-3832.)
© 2000 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Comparing a Parallel PERG, Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Thresholds

Teddy Maddess1, Andrew Charles James1, Ivan Goldberg2, Stephen Wine2 and Jeffrey Dobinson2

1 From the Centre for Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra; and the 2 Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

PURPOSE. A pattern electroretinogram (PERG) simultaneously displaying the frequency-doubling (FD) illusion in nine parts of the visual field was compared with two other methods for ability to detect glaucoma. This multiregion FD PERG (MFP) was compared with results from achromatic automated perimetry and psychophysical tests using FD stimuli.

METHODS. MFP data were compared with that from the Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA; Humphrey, San Leandro, CA) 24-2 program. Contrast thresholds were also determined in different visual field locations for FD stimuli. Thin-plate spline methods were used to derive comparisons from the tests, each of which sampled the visual field differently.

RESULTS. Significant correlation with HFA could be obtained, providing seven to nine (of nine) MFP amplitudes were themselves significant. Evidence showed that both the psychophysical tests using FD stimuli and the MFP detect glaucomatous damage not detected by the HFA.

CONCLUSIONS. The comparisons between HFA perimetry, the MFP, and FD thresholds indicate that both FD-based tests quantify a form of diffuse loss in early glaucoma as well as the scotomas of later glaucoma.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. Maddess, A. C. James, I. Goldberg, S. Wine, and J. Dobinson
A Spatial Frequency-Doubling Illusion-Based Pattern Electroretinogram for Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2000; 41(12): 3818 - 3826.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology