HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ogino, T. Articles by Ohtsuka, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ogino, T. Articles by Ohtsuka, K.

Effects of Superior Colliculus Inhibition on Visual Motion Processing in the Lateral Suprasylvian Visual Area of the Cat

¹ From the Department of Ophthalmology, Sapporo Medical University, Japan.

PURPOSE. To clarify whether visual inputs of the tectothalamocortical pathway influence motion processing within the lateral suprasylvian (LS) area of the cat.

METHODS. This study was conducted in five cats. Tungsten microelectrodes were used for recording visual evoked potentials. The electrodes were introduced into the LS area. An array of 120 randomly located dots was projected onto the stimulus field (40° x 40°) in front of the animal by a slide projector. The dots were moved rightward and leftward alternatively with interstimulus intervals by a mirror attached to a galvanometer, the movements of which were controlled by a microcomputer. Each motion sequence consisted of an abrupt onset of motion that continued for 100 msec followed by an abrupt offset and a stationary phase of 900 msec; the total duration of each sequence was thus 1000 msec. The velocity of the motion was varied in 12 steps. The onset of motion was used as the trigger for recording evoked potentials. Single or multiple injections (two to three) of muscimol were made, mainly into the rostral superior colliculus (SC). The amplitudes of evoked potentials before and after the muscimol injection were compared.

RESULTS. A large negative wave (N1) with the peak latency of 89.80 ± 16.39 msec (mean ± SD, n = 191) was recorded consistently. The amplitude of N1 was not altered by the muscimol injection into the SC when the velocity of motion was 50 deg/sec or less. When the velocity of motion was 75 deg/sec or more, however, the amplitude of N1 was reduced to 62% to72% of that noted before the muscimol injection.

CONCLUSIONS. These findings suggest that the LS area processes the visual motion inputs reaching through the two parallel pathways, the geniculostriate pathway and the tectothalamocortical pathway, when the velocity of visual motion is 75 deg/sec or more.