IOVS Stem Cells
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilhelm, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zrenner, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilhelm, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zrenner, E.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2000;41:1229-1238.)
© 2000 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Pupil Perimetry using M-Sequence Stimulation Technique

Helmut Wilhelm, Jürgen Neitzel, Barbara Wilhelm, Stefan Beuel, Holger Lüdtke, Ulf Kretschmann and Eberhart Zrenner

From the Universitäts-Augenklinik, Department of Pathophysiology of Vision and Neuro-ophthalmology, Tübingen, Germany.

PURPOSE. M-sequence stimulation technique allows mapping of the retinal function by multifocal electroretinographic (ERG) recordings. However, the information provided about visual field is limited to retinal function. Optic nerve diseases and diseases of the higher visual pathways usually show normal multifocal ERGs. Using pupillary responses instead of the electrical retinal responses might enhance the diagnostic possibilities of this system. The problems of local ERG recordings are very similar to those encountered in pupil perimetry: Local stimuli have to be dim to avoid or at least reduce stray-light responses. Dim stimuli, close to the absolute threshold, elicit only subtle pupillomotor responses. Therefore, techniques that are able to detect small focal responses are promising.

METHODS. Pupillography was done by means of an infrared video camera and real time image processing (50 Hz) using a custom-designed videoboard in a personal computer (486). Recording conditions: The stimulus was presented on a monitor (75 Hz) in 26 cm distance from the patient’s eyes. It contained 37 hexagons in a 25° visual field. Each element changed between black (1.6 cd/m2) and white (160 cd/m2) after a binary M-sequence independently from other elements. Four thousand ninety six different stimulus pictures of 120-msec duration were shown during a single pupillogram recording. Thirty-seven local pupillograms were calculated in a cross-correlation of stimulus sequence and the pupil diameter.

RESULTS. The pupillomotor fields in normals showed a shape and sensitivity distribution as known from conventional pupil perimetry techniques. Artificial paracentral scotomas (5°) created by masking different locations could be demonstrated convincingly. Even in patients with optic nerve lesions it was possible to demonstrate visual field defects.

CONCLUSIONS. Pupil perimetry using the M-sequence technique is a promising method of objective perimetry that may find its entrance into clinical application.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. Link, A. Junemann, R. Rix, O. Sembritzki, A. Brenning, M. Korth, and F. K. Horn
Pupillographic Measurements with Pattern Stimulation: The Pupil's Response in Normal Subjects and First Measurements in Glaucoma Patients
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4947 - 4955.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M Bach
Latency of the mfVEP to diagnose glaucoma?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2006; 90(9): 1076 - 1077.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Stroux, M. Korth, A. Junemann, J. B. Jonas, F. Horn, A. Ziegler, and P. Martus
A Statistical Model for the Evaluation of Sensory Tests in Glaucoma, Depending on Optic Disc Damage
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 2879 - 2884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology