IOVS Heart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schworm, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boergen, K.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schworm, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Boergen, K.-P.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2000;41:1710-1718.)
© 2000 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Clinical Significance of Saccade Analysis in Early Active Graves’ Ophthalmopathy

Hermann Dieter Schworm1, Armin Ernst Heufelder2, Andrea Kunze1, Esther Welge1 and Klaus–Peter Boergen1

1 From the Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich; and 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany.

PURPOSE. To assess whether saccadic eye movements show distinct changes in patients with early active Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO), which could serve as a diagnostic tool for early detection and treatment.

METHODS. Each of two prospective studies included 10 patients with early acute GO and 10 age- and sex-matched control subjects. In the explorative study (ES) 15 dynamic parameters of saccades were analyzed. In the comparative study (CS) only those parameters were evaluated, which in ES had shown significant differences between patients and controls. Horizontal and vertical saccades of 10°, 20°, and 40° including a fatigue test were recorded binocularly using the induction scleral search coil.

RESULTS. The differences of saccadic dynamics between patients and controls were small, whereas intra- and interindividual standard deviations were large. In ES, 7.1% of the parameters showed significant differences at a level of P <= 0.05. In CS, 2.1% of all parameters revealed repetitive significant differences. Despite statistical significance, individual data did not allow differentiation between patients and healthy individuals due to high standard deviations.

CONCLUSIONS. In early active GO no clinically relevant saccadic changes were detected. These findings may be based on adaptation of the central saccadic generator. Inclusion of patients with fibrotic muscle changes due to long-standing disease could explain the contrasting results of previous studies. Consequently, analysis of saccades does not serve as a diagnostic tool during early active GO.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology