|
|
||||||||
From the Visual Function Laboratory and Glaucoma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California at San Diego.
PURPOSE. To compare short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and motion-automated perimetry, each of which assesses different aspects of visual function, in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and ocular hypertension.
METHODS. One hundred thirty-six eyes from 136 subjects were evaluated with all three tests as well as with standard automated perimetry. Fields were not used in the classification of study groups to prevent bias, because the major purpose of the study was to evaluate each field type relative to the others. Seventy-one of the 136 eyes had glaucomatous optic neuropathy, 37 had ocular hypertension, and 28 served as age-matched normal control eyes. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy was defined by assessment of stereophotographs. Criteria were asymmetrical cupping, the presence of rim thinning, notching, excavation, or nerve fiber layer defect. Ocular hypertensive eyes had intraocular pressure of 23 mm Hg or more on at least two occasions and normal-appearing optic disc stereophotographs. Criteria for abnormality on each visual field test were selected to approximate a specificity of 90% in the normal eyes. Thresholds for each of the four tests were compared, to determine the percentage that were abnormal within each patient group and to assess the agreement among test results for abnormality, location, and extent of visual field deficit.
RESULTS. Each test identified a subset of the eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy as abnormal: 46% with standard perimetry, 61% with short-wavelength automated perimetry, 70% with frequency-doubling perimetry, and 52% with motion-automated perimetry. In the ocular hypertensive eyes, standard perimetry was abnormal in 5%, short wavelength in 22%, frequency doubling in 46%, and motion in 30%. Fifty-four percent (38/71) of eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy were normal on standard fields. However, 90% were identified by at least one of the specific visual function tests. Combining tests improved sensitivity with slight reductions in specificity. The agreement in at least one quadrant, when a defect was present with more than one test, was very high at 92% to 97%. More extensive deficits were shown by frequency-doubling perimetry followed by short-wavelength automated perimetry, then motion-automated perimetry, and last, standard perimetry. However, there were significant individual differences in which test of any given pairing was more extensively affected. Only 30% (11/37) of the ocular hypertensive eyes showed no deficits at all compared with 71% (20/28) of the control eyes (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS. For detection of functional loss standard visual field testing is not optimum; a combination of two or more tests may improve detection of functional loss in these eyes; in an individual, the same retinal location is damaged, regardless of visual function under test; glaucomatous optic neuropathy identified on stereophotographs may precede currently measurable function loss in some eyes; conversely, function loss with specific tests may precede detection of abnormality by stereophotograph review; and short-wavelength automated perimetry, frequency-doubling perimetry, and motion-automated perimetry continue to show promise as early indicators of function loss in glaucoma.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G P Sampson, D R Badcock, M J Walland, and A M McKendrick Foveal contrast processing of increment and decrement targets is equivalently reduced in glaucoma Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2008; 92(9): 1287 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wall, C. F. Brito, K. R. Woodward, C. K. Doyle, R. H. Kardon, and C. A. Johnson Total Deviation Probability Plots for Stimulus Size V Perimetry: A Comparison With Size III Stimuli Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2008; 126(4): 473 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Racette, F. A. Medeiros, L. M. Zangwill, D. Ng, R. N. Weinreb, and P. A. Sample Diagnostic Accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and Original N-30 Frequency-Doubling Technology Tests Compared with Standard Automated Perimetry Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 954 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. X. Wang, L. Xu, R. X. Zhang, and J. B. Jonas Frequency-Doubling Threshold Perimetry in Predicting Glaucoma in a Population-Based Study: The Beijing Eye Study Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 2007; 125(10): 1402 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Falkenberg and P. J. Bex Sources of Motion-Sensitivity Loss in Glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2913 - 2921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Sakata, J. DeLeon-Ortega, S. N. Arthur, B. E. Monheit, and C. A. Girkin Detecting Visual Function Abnormalities Using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm and Matrix Perimetry in Eyes With Glaucomatous Appearance of the Optic Disc Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2007; 125(3): 340 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Harwerth, A. S. Vilupuru, N. V. Rangaswamy, and E. L. Smith III The Relationship between Nerve Fiber Layer and Perimetry Measurements Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 763 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Sample, F. A. Medeiros, L. Racette, J. P. Pascual, C. Boden, L. M. Zangwill, C. Bowd, and R. N. Weinreb Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 3381 - 3389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Kogure, Y Toda, and S Tsukahara Prediction of future scotoma on conventional automated static perimetry using frequency doubling technology perimetry. Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2006; 90(3): 347 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M A R Siddiqui, A Azuara-Blanco, and S Neville Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with glaucoma Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2005; 89(12): 1569 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Racette, C. Boden, S. L. Kleinhandler, C. A. Girkin, J. M. Liebmann, L. M. Zangwill, F. A. Medeiros, C. Bowd, R. N. Weinreb, M. R. Wilson, et al. Differences in Visual Function and Optic Nerve Structure Between Healthy Eyes of Blacks and Whites Arch Ophthalmol, November 1, 2005; 123(11): 1547 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C A Westall Detecting ocular-visual function changes in diabetes Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2005; 89(11): 1392 - 1393. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. McKendrick, D. R. Badcock, and W. H. Morgan The Detection of both Global Motion and Global Form Is Disrupted in Glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3693 - 3701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Boden, J. Pascual, F. A. Medeiros, M. Aihara, R. N. Weinreb, and P. A. Sample Relationship of SITA and Full-Threshold Standard Perimetry to Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry in Glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2433 - 2439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Haymes, D. M. Hutchison, T. A. McCormick, D. K. Varma, M. T. Nicolela, R. P. LeBlanc, and B. C. Chauhan Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression with Frequency-Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry in a Longitudinal Prospective Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 547 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Brusini, M L Salvetat, L Parisi, and M Zeppieri Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2005; 89(2): 180 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C A Johnson Frequency doubling technology perimetry for neuro-ophthalmological diseases Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2004; 88(10): 1232 - 1233. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C A Girkin, G McGwin Jr, and J DeLeon-Ortega Frequency doubling technology perimetry in non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy with altitudinal defects Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2004; 88(10): 1274 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Harwerth, L. Carter-Dawson, E. L. Smith III, G. Barnes, W. F. Holt, and M. L. J. Crawford Neural Losses Correlated with Visual Losses in Clinical Perimetry Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3152 - 3160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Sample, K. Chan, C. Boden, T.-W. Lee, E. Z. Blumenthal, R. N. Weinreb, A. Bernd, J. Pascual, J. Hao, T. Sejnowski, et al. Using Unsupervised Learning with Variational Bayesian Mixture of Factor Analysis to Identify Patterns of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 2596 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. McKendrick and D. R. Badcock Decreased Visual Field Sensitivity Measured 1 Day, Then 1 Week, after Migraine Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2004; 45(4): 1061 - 1070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Landers, I. Goldberg, and S. L. Graham Detection of Early Visual Field Loss in Glaucoma Using Frequency-Doubling Perimetry and Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2003; 121(12): 1705 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. O. Beirne, J. F. J. Logan, M. B. Zlatkova, A. J. Jackson, S. J. A. Rankin, S. Demirel, and R. S. Anderson Peripheral Resolution for Achromatic and SWS Gratings in Early to Moderate Glaucoma and the Implications for Selective Ganglion Cell Density Loss Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 4780 - 4786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Fujimoto, D W Zhang, K Minowa, T Hanawa, O Miyauchi, and E Adachi-Usami Relative hypersensitivity in healthy eye by frequency doubling perimetry in patients with severely damaged contralateral eye Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2003; 87(6): 794 - 794. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Boden, P. A. Sample, A. G. Boehm, C. Vasile, R. Akinepalli, and R. N. Weinreb The Structure-Function Relationship in Eyes With Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss That Crosses the Horizontal Meridian Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 2002; 120(7): 907 - 912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M C Westcott, D F Garway-Heath, F W Fitzke, D Kamal, and R A Hitchings Use of high spatial resolution perimetry to identify scotomata not apparent with conventional perimetry in the nasal field of glaucomatous subjects Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2002; 86(7): 761 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E A Ansari, J E Morgan, and R J Snowden Glaucoma: squaring the psychophysics and neurobiology Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2002; 86(7): 823 - 826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wall, R. K. Neahring, and K. R. Woodward Sensitivity and Specificity of Frequency Doubling Perimetry in Neuro-ophthalmic Disorders: A Comparison with Conventional Automated Perimetry Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2002; 43(4): 1277 - 1283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bowd, L. M. Zangwill, C. C. Berry, E. Z. Blumenthal, C. Vasile, C. Sanchez-Galeana, C. F. Bosworth, P. A. Sample, and R. N. Weinreb Detecting Early Glaucoma by Assessment of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Visual Function Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2001; 42(9): 1993 - 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |