HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elnifro, E. M. Articles by Tullo, A. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Elnifro, E. M. Articles by Tullo, A. B.

Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction for Diagnosis of Viral and Chlamydial Keratoconjunctivitis

¹ From the School of Medicine, The University of Manchester; ² Clinical Virology, Central Manchester Healthcare Trust; and the ³ Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To develop a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of adenovirus, herpes simplex virus, and Chlamydia trachomatis in conjunctival swabs.

METHODS. Oligonucleotide primers for detection of the 3 agents were combined in one reaction and evaluated for optimal performance using control DNAs of adenovirus type 2, herpes simplex virus, and C. trachomatis plasmid. The multiplex PCR was evaluated prospectively against its corresponding uniplex PCRs, virus isolation, Chlamydia Amplicor PCR, and an immunoassay technique (immune dot blot test) in a total of 805 conjunctival swabs from patients with suspected viral and chlamydial keratoconjunctivitis.

RESULTS. The multiplex PCR was as sensitive as uniplex PCRs for the detection of the agents in clinical specimens. In the prospective study, 48 of 49 (98%) clinical specimens were positive for adenovirus by the multiplex PCR compared with 26 of 49 (53%) by adenovirus isolation. For herpes simplex virus detection, the multiplex PCR had a sensitivity of 92% (34/37) compared with 94.5% (35/37) by cell culture. The multiplex PCR produced identical results to the Amplicor PCR (21/21; 100%) compared with 71% (15/21) by the immune dot blot test.

CONCLUSIONS. With clinical specimens the multiplex PCR was as sensitive as its respective uniplex PCRs but more sensitive than adenovirus isolation and as sensitive as herpes simplex virus isolation or C. trachomatis Amplicor PCR. It has the potential to replace several diagnostic tests with consequent savings in cost. The test also reduces the risk of misdiagnosis by the clinicians.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S Sugita, N Shimizu, K Watanabe, M Mizukami, T Morio, Y Sugamoto, and M Mochizuki Use of multiplex PCR and real-time PCR to detect human herpes virus genome in ocular fluids of patients with uveitis Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2008; 92(7): 928 - 932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Elnifro, R. J. Cooper, I. Dady, S. Hany, Z. M. Mughal, and P. E. Klapper Three Nonfatal Cases of Neonatal Adenovirus Infection J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2005; 43(11): 5814 - 5815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Syrmis, D. M. Whiley, M. Thomas, I. M. Mackay, J. Williamson, D. J. Siebert, M. D. Nissen, and T. P. Sloots A Sensitive, Specific, and Cost-Effective Multiplex Reverse Transcriptase-PCR Assay for the Detection of Seven Common Respiratory Viruses in Respiratory Samples J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2004; 6(2): 125 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C S Bradshaw, I M Denham, and C K Fairley Characteristics of adenovirus associated urethritis Sex. Transm. Inf., December 1, 2002; 78(6): 445 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]