HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eikelboom, R. H. Articles by House, P. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Eikelboom, R. H. Articles by House, P. H.

Methods and Limits of Digital Image Compression of Retinal Images for Telemedicine

From the Lions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia.

PURPOSE. To investigate image compression of digital retinal images and the effect of various levels of compression on the quality of the images.

METHODS. JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) and Wavelet image compression techniques were applied in five different levels to 11 eyes with subtle retinal abnormalities and to 4 normal eyes. Image quality was assessed by four different methods: calculation of the root mean square (RMS) error between the original and compressed image, determining the level of arteriole branching, identification of retinal abnormalities by experienced observers, and a subjective assessment of overall image quality. To verify the techniques used and findings, a second set of retinal images was assessed by calculation of RMS error and overall image quality.

RESULTS. Plots and tabulations of the data as a function of the final image size showed that when the original image size of 1.5 MB was reduced to 29 KB using JPEG compression, there was no serious degradation in quality. The smallest Wavelet compressed images in this study (15 KB) were generally still of acceptable quality.

CONCLUSIONS. For situations where digital image transmission time and costs should be minimized, Wavelet image compression to 15 KB is recommended, although there is a slight cost of computational time. Where computational time should be minimized, and to remain compatible with other imaging systems, the use of JPEG compression to 29 KB is an excellent alternative.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L Koenig, E Parks, M Analoui, and G Eckert The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2004; 33(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Gomez-Ulla, M. I. Fernandez, F. Gonzalez, P. Rey, M. Rodriguez, M. J. Rodriguez-Cid, F. F. Casanueva, M. A. Tome, J. Garcia-Tobio, and F. Gude Response to Merin and Reeves Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 966 - 967. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. P. Leese, A. Ellingford, A. D. Morris, J. D. Ellis, and S. Cunningham Screening Using Compressed Digital Retinal Images Successfully Identifies Retinopathy Diabetes Care, January 1, 2003; 26(1): 247 - 247. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Gomez-Ulla, M. I. Fernandez, F. Gonzalez, P. Rey, M. Rodriguez, M. J. Rodriguez-Cid, F. F. Casanueva, M. A. Tome, J. Garcia-Tobio, and F. Gude Digital Retinal Images and Teleophthalmology for Detecting and Grading Diabetic Retinopathy Diabetes Care, August 1, 2002; 25(8): 1384 - 1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]