IOVS Annual Reviews: Physical Science Suite
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collison, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collison, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, G.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2000;41:2633-2641.)
© 2000 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Characterization of Muscarinic Receptors in Human Lens Cells by Pharmacologic and Molecular Techniques

David J. Collison1, Robert A. Coleman2, Rowena S. James2, Jae Carey2 and George Duncan1

1 From the School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich; and 2 Pharmagene Laboratories, Royston, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. Activation of muscarinic receptors has been implicated in an increased risk of cataract after anticholinesterase treatment for glaucoma. The purpose of the present study was to determine the acetylcholine muscarinic receptor subtype(s) present in native human lens epithelial cells (NHLECs) and a human lens cell line, HLE-B3, and to compare the distribution in other ocular cells.

METHODS. Human lens cells were perfused with artificial aqueous humor (35°C) after fura-2 incorporation, and calcium levels were measured using a fluorometric single-cell digital imaging system. Acetylcholine was the primary muscarinic agonist, and the receptor subtypes were elucidated by determining the relative effectiveness of pirenzepine and AF-DX 384 in blocking the agonist-induced response. The levels of expression of mRNA for the receptor subtypes M1 through M5 were determined by quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) using a sequence detection system (ABI Prism 7700; Perkin–Elmer, Foster City, CA). This was performed using total RNA extracted from native lens, retina, iris, and sclera and also cultured lens cells.

RESULTS. Acetylcholine induced a similar concentration-dependent increase in peak-amplitude cytosolic calcium in the range 100 nM to 100 µM in both native and HLE-B3 cells. However, the kinetics of the response waveforms to 30-second pulses of acetylcholine were different in the two cell types. At higher concentrations (>1 µM), a second phase appeared in the HLE-B3 cells that was absent in the NHLEC response. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for blockade of a 1 µM acetylcholine response by pirenzepine and AF-DX 384 were 30 nM and 230 nM, respectively, for NHLECs, and 300 nM and 92 nM, respectively, for HLE-B3 cells. The QRT-PCR data showed that more than 90% of the total muscarinic receptor mRNA from NHLEC was of M1 origin. In the HLE-B3 cells, however, more than 95% of the mRNA was of M3 origin. mRNA for M3 was also in greatest abundance in other eye tissues, although there was a significant contribution from M1 in iris and sclera.

CONCLUSIONS. Both NHLECs and HLE-B3 cells express muscarinic receptors that produce significant changes in cytosolic calcium in response to acetylcholine. Both pharmacologic and QRT-PCR evidence shows that whereas the M1 subtype predominates in NHLECs, M3 is the major contributor in HLE-B3 cells. In all other eye tissues, M3 appears to be the major contributor. These data should be taken into account when choosing particular models to investigate cataract mechanisms and also when designing muscarinic agonists to treat glaucoma.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Liu, J. Li, D. T. H. Tan, and R. W. Beuerman
Expression and Function of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes on Human Cornea and Conjunctiva
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 2987 - 2996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. James, D. J. Collison, and G. Duncan
Characterization and Functional Activity of Thrombin Receptors in the Human Lens
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2005; 46(3): 925 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. A. Ostrin, L. J. Frishman, and A. Glasser
Effects of Pirenzepine on Pupil Size and Accommodation in Rhesus Monkeys
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 3620 - 3628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. M. Maidment, G. Duncan, S. Tamiya, D. J. Collison, L. Wang, and I. M. Wormstone
Regional Differences in Tyrosine Kinase Receptor Signaling Components Determine Differential Growth Patterns in the Human Lens
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 1427 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. J. Collison, L. Wang, I. M. Wormstone, and G. Duncan
Spatial Characteristics of Receptor-Induced Calcium Signaling in Human Lens Capsular Bags
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2004; 45(1): 200 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Oppitz, A. Mack, and U. Drews
Ca2+-Mobilization and Cell Contraction after Muscarinic Cholinergic Stimulation of the Chick Embryo Lens
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 4813 - 4819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
G. Durand, M.-F. Hubert, H. Kuno, W. O. Cook, C. Boussiquet-Leroux, R. Owen, Y. Fujimaki, M. Kemi, M. Virat, and M. J. van Zwieten
Muscarinic Receptor Antagonist-Induced Lenticular Opacity in Rats
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2002; 66(1): 166 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. J. Collison and G. Duncan
Regional Differences in Functional Receptor Distribution and Calcium Mobilization in the Intact Human Lens
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2001; 42(10): 2355 - 2363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
P. Donaldson, J. Kistler, and R. T. Mathias
Molecular Solutions to Mammalian Lens Transparency
Physiology, June 1, 2001; 16(3): 118 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. R. Williams, R. A. Riach, D. J. Collison, and G. Duncan
Role of the Endoplasmic Reticulum in Shaping Calcium Dynamics in Human Lens Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2001; 42(5): 1009 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology