IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansari–Shahrezaei, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stur, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ansari–Shahrezaei, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stur, M.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:153-157.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Biomicroscopic Measurement of the Optic Disc with a High-Power Positive Lens

Siamak Ansari–Shahrezaei, Noemi Maar, Robert Biowski and Michael Stur

From the Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Vienna University School of Medicine, Austria.

PURPOSE. To compare the magnification properties of four different indirect double aspheric fundus examination lenses for clinical disc biometry.

METHODS. Experimental study in a model eye. The relationship between the true size of a fundus object and its image was calculated for each fundus lens for an ametropic range between -12.5 and +12.6 D using a slit lamp biomicroscope with adjustable beam length.

RESULTS. Equations for determining the correction factor p (degrees per millimeter) were calculated for each fundus lens. The factor can be used in calculations to determine true optic disc size. The total change in magnification of the system from myopia to hyperopia was -21.1% to +24.0% (60-D lens; Volk Opticals, Mentor, OH), -12.9% to +16.2% (Volk super 66 stereo fundus lens), -13.2% to +13.9% (Volk 78-D lens), and -13.3% to +14.0% (Volk super-field NC lens). When the fundus lens position was altered im relation to the model eye by ±2 mm under myopic conditions, the change in magnification of the system was -4.3% to +5.7% (60-D lens), -4.6% to +6.1% (66 stereo fundus lens), -4.9% to +6.3% (78-D lens), and -5.9% to +7.8% (super-field NC lens). In the hyperopic condition the change was -2.7% to +3.6%, -3.4% to +4.5%, -3.6% to +4.8%, and -4.5% to +6.0%.

CONCLUSIONS. The study has shown that the use of a single magnification correction value for each fundus lens may not be appropriate. These findings have important implications for the way in which calculations for determining the true optic disc size and other structures of the posterior pole are performed using indirect biomicroscopy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Ansari-Shahrezaei and M. Stur
Magnification Characteristic of a +90-Diopter Double-Aspheric Fundus Examination Lens
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 1817 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology