|
|
||||||||
From 1 Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology, Louisiana State University (LSU) Health Sciences Center, and 3 Department of Ophthalmology, LSU Eye Center, New Orleans.
PURPOSE. This study analyzed rabbit tears for anti-staphylococcal activity, the role of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) in this reaction, and the ability of enzyme inhibitors to promote bacterial survival.
METHODS. Contact lenses with Staphylococcus aureus were applied to scarified rabbit eyes. The colony-forming units (CFU) per cornea or lens were determined and pathology was scored by slit-lamp examination (SLE). The bactericidal activity was measured by incubating bacteria with rabbit tears or PLA2 at 33° or 37°C. Radiolabeled S. aureus was incubated with PLA2 or tears to quantify the release of a membrane component that was identified by thin-layer chromatography. Inhibitors of these reactions were also analyzed.
RESULTS. Application of Staphylococcus, on contact lenses, to
rabbit corneas resulted in bacterial killing and limited inflammation.
Incubation of tears and bacteria (1:1; v/v) in tryptic soy broth at
33°C decreased CFU approximately 4 logs. Tears (
30 µl) or PLA2
(
30 U) incubated with bacteria in phosphate-buffered saline
were bactericidal. PLA2 (
0.2 U) or tears (
2 µl) cleaved bacterial
membranes, liberating arachidonic acid. Spermidine or tetracaine
inhibited cleavage of bacterial membranes by tears or PLA2 and
spermidine promoted bacterial survival and growth in tears. Tears (60
µl) killed >99% of the bacterial inoculum, whereas bacteria
incubated in tears plus spermidine approximately doubled in number.
CONCLUSIONS. PLA2 in rabbit tears kills Staphylococcus by hydrolyzing bacterial membranes to release arachidonic acid. Spermidine and tetracaine inhibited PLA2 activity and spermidine protected Staphylococcus from PLA2 in rabbit tears.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. C. Turner, M. T. Budak, M. A. M. Akinci, and J. M. Wolosin Comparative Analysis of Human Conjunctival and Corneal Epithelial Gene Expression with Oligonucleotide Microarrays Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 2050 - 2061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sun, A. G. Hise, C. M. Kalsow, and E. Pearlman Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Corneal Inflammation Is Dependent on Toll-Like Receptor 2 and Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88 Infect. Immun., September 1, 2006; 74(9): 5325 - 5332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hori, S. J. Spurr-Michaud, C. L. Russo, P. Argueso, and I. K. Gipson Effect of Retinoic Acid on Gene Expression in Human Conjunctival Epithelium: Secretory Phospholipase A2 Mediates Retinoic Acid Induction of MUC16 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 4050 - 4061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. O. Girgis, J. M. Reed, K. S. Monds, J. J. Dajcs, M. E. Marquart, B. A. Thibodeaux, and R. J. O'Callaghan Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus in the Rabbit Anterior Chamber Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1371 - 1378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. H. Hume, N. Cole, A. Parmar, M. E. Tan, Y. Aliwarga, T. Schubert, B. A. Holden, and M. D. P. Willcox Secretory Phospholipase A2 Deposition on Contact Lenses and Its Effect on Bacterial Adhesion Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3161 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. O. Girgis, G. D. Sloop, J. M. Reed, and R. J. O'Callaghan A New Topical Model of Staphylococcus Corneal Infection in the Mouse Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 1591 - 1597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. O. Girgis, J. J. Dajcs, and R. J. O'Callaghan Phospholipase A2 Activity in Normal and Staphylococcus aureus-Infected Rabbit Eyes Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2003; 44(1): 197 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. B. H. Hume, J. J. Dajcs, J. M. Moreau, G. D. Sloop, M. D. P. Willcox, and R. J. O'Callaghan Staphylococcus Corneal Virulence in a New Topical Model of Infection Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2001; 42(12): 2904 - 2908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |