IOVS Infection and Immunity
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heinrich, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bach, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heinrich, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Bach, M.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:2721-2727.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Contrast Adaptation in Human Retina and Cortex

Thomas Stephan Heinrich and Michael Bach

From the Elektrophysiologisches Labor, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Freiburg, Germany.

PURPOSE. Although cortical contrast adaptation has been extensively studied with both psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques, little is known about retinal contrast adaptation in humans.

METHODS. Retinal and cortical long-term contrast adaptation was assessed with simultaneous measurement of pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and cortical visual evoked potentials (VEPs). This study involved three approaches: sampling of the contrast transfer function from 2.7% to 98% with adaptation to high (98%) and low (7.3%) contrasts, linearity of adaptation effects, and transfer of contrast adaptation between parallel and orthogonal grating orientations.

RESULTS. Contrast adaptation affected retinal and cortical recordings quite differently. The VEP showed a sigmoid contrast transfer function, which was shifted toward higher contrasts (by a factor of 1.9), whereas amplitudes at higher test contrasts were enhanced to 127%. The PERG decreased in amplitude to approximately 90%, and the latency was significantly reduced by 4 to 6 msec (P < 0.05). All measured effects were linear with adaptation contrast. Orientation played no role in the PERG results, whereas the VEP was enhanced to 125% when tested parallel and to 150% when tested orthogonal to adaptation.

CONCLUSIONS. VEP results confirm and extend previous findings and fit well with single-cell recordings. The PERG findings suggest that retinal contrast adaptation occurs and mainly operates in the temporal domain, comparable to rapid gain–control findings in cats and primates.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M Bach, J P Maurer, and M E Wolf
Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2008; 92(3): 396 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
V. Porciatti, N. Sorokac, and W. Buchser
Habituation of Retinal Ganglion Cell Activity in Response to Steady State Pattern Visual Stimuli in Normal Subjects
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1296 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. D. Haynes, G. Roth, M. Stadler, and H. J. Heinze
Neuromagnetic Correlates of Perceived Contrast in Primary Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 2655 - 2666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. Fortune and D. C. Hood
Conventional Pattern-Reversal VEPs Are Not Equivalent to Summed Multifocal VEPs
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2003; 44(3): 1364 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology