|
|
||||||||
1 From the Departments of Ophthalmology and 2 Physiology and Biophysics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; 3 Haemek Medical Center, Afula, Israel; and 4 Medical Sciences Program, Indiana University, Bloomington.
PURPOSE. In vitro models suggest that Heidelberg retina flowmeter (HRF) measurements are affected by changes in photodetector sensitivity. We measured blood flow in a single volume of human retinal tissue in vivo at various sensitivity (DC) levels.
METHODS. The peripapillary retinal regions of 12 normal subjects were examined by HRF under five different sensitivity settings: (1) average DC range below 100; (2) average DC range below 125; (3) average DC range near 150 (normal sensitivity); (4) average DC range above 175; and (5) average DC range above 200 or extremely overexposed. The distributions of flow values were examined by pointwise analysis. All pixels from a common tissue location were analyzed, and the effect of their brightness on the flow measurement was evaluated by ANOVA with Fishers protected least significant difference model.
RESULTS. ANOVA analysis of image DC level showed that significantly different DC levels were achieved for each of the five sensitivity settings (P < 0.0001). Flow values decreased with increasing DC for each of the 25th percentile, 50th percentile (P < 0.0001 for each), 75th percentile (P = 0.0026), 90th percentile (P = 0.0216), and mean (P = 0.0004) flow values. The percentage of pixels with values of zero (avascular tissue) increased with increasing photodetector sensitivity (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS. Improper sensitivity settings alter the detected percentage of avascular tissue and the blood flow measurements in tissue containing capillaries. Consistent assessment of retinal blood flow requires consistent photodetector sensitivity settings between longitudinal images.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sehi, J. G. Flanagan, L. Zeng, R. J. Cook, and G. E. Trope Anterior Optic Nerve Capillary Blood Flow Response to Diurnal Variation of Mean Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Early Untreated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 4581 - 4587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S T Venkataraman, C Hudson, E Harvey, and J G Flanagan Impact of simulated light scatter on scanning laser Doppler flowmetry Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2005; 89(9): 1192 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-Y. Yu, R. Townsend, S. J. Cringle, B. C. Chauhan, and W. H. Morgan Improved Interpretation of Flow Maps Obtained by Scanning Laser Doppler Flowmetry Using a Rat Model of Retinal Artery Occlusion Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 166 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C P Jonescu-Cuypers, A Harris, R Wilson, L Kagemann, L V Mavroudis, F Topouzis, and A L Coleman Reproducibility of the Heidelberg retinal flowmeter in determining low perfusion areas in peripapillary retina Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2004; 88(10): 1266 - 1269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C P Jonescu-Cuypers, A Harris, K U Bartz-Schmidt, L Kagemann, A S Boros, U E Heimann, B H Lenz, R-D Hilgers, and G K Krieglstein Reproducibility of circadian retinal and optic nerve head blood flow measurements by Heidelberg retina flowmetry Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2004; 88(3): 348 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Sehi and J G Flanagan The effect of image alignment on capillary blood flow measurement of the neuroretinal rim using the Heidelberg retina flowmeter Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2004; 88(2): 204 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Loukovaara, M. Harju, R. Kaaja, and I. Immonen Retinal Capillary Blood Flow in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Women during Pregnancy and Postpartum Period Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 1486 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Gugleta, S. Orgul, I. Flammer, D. Gherghel, and J. Flammer Reliability of Confocal Choroidal Laser Doppler Flowmetry Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 723 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |