IOVS Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kagemann, L.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kagemann, L.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, B.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:354-357.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Photodetector Sensitivity Level and Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter Measurements in Humans

Larry Kagemann1, Alon Harris1,2, Hak Sung Chung1, Christian P. Jonescu-Cuypers1, Drora Zarfati3 and Bruce Martin1,4

1 From the Departments of Ophthalmology and 2 Physiology and Biophysics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; 3 Haemek Medical Center, Afula, Israel; and 4 Medical Sciences Program, Indiana University, Bloomington.

PURPOSE. In vitro models suggest that Heidelberg retina flowmeter (HRF) measurements are affected by changes in photodetector sensitivity. We measured blood flow in a single volume of human retinal tissue in vivo at various sensitivity (DC) levels.

METHODS. The peripapillary retinal regions of 12 normal subjects were examined by HRF under five different sensitivity settings: (1) average DC range below 100; (2) average DC range below 125; (3) average DC range near 150 (normal sensitivity); (4) average DC range above 175; and (5) average DC range above 200 or extremely overexposed. The distributions of flow values were examined by pointwise analysis. All pixels from a common tissue location were analyzed, and the effect of their brightness on the flow measurement was evaluated by ANOVA with Fisher’s protected least significant difference model.

RESULTS. ANOVA analysis of image DC level showed that significantly different DC levels were achieved for each of the five sensitivity settings (P < 0.0001). Flow values decreased with increasing DC for each of the 25th percentile, 50th percentile (P < 0.0001 for each), 75th percentile (P = 0.0026), 90th percentile (P = 0.0216), and mean (P = 0.0004) flow values. The percentage of pixels with values of zero (avascular tissue) increased with increasing photodetector sensitivity (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS. Improper sensitivity settings alter the detected percentage of avascular tissue and the blood flow measurements in tissue containing capillaries. Consistent assessment of retinal blood flow requires consistent photodetector sensitivity settings between longitudinal images.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
M. Sehi, J. G. Flanagan, L. Zeng, R. J. Cook, and G. E. Trope
Anterior Optic Nerve Capillary Blood Flow Response to Diurnal Variation of Mean Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Early Untreated Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 4581 - 4587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S T Venkataraman, C Hudson, E Harvey, and J G Flanagan
Impact of simulated light scatter on scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2005; 89(9): 1192 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
D.-Y. Yu, R. Townsend, S. J. Cringle, B. C. Chauhan, and W. H. Morgan
Improved Interpretation of Flow Maps Obtained by Scanning Laser Doppler Flowmetry Using a Rat Model of Retinal Artery Occlusion
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 166 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C P Jonescu-Cuypers, A Harris, R Wilson, L Kagemann, L V Mavroudis, F Topouzis, and A L Coleman
Reproducibility of the Heidelberg retinal flowmeter in determining low perfusion areas in peripapillary retina
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2004; 88(10): 1266 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C P Jonescu-Cuypers, A Harris, K U Bartz-Schmidt, L Kagemann, A S Boros, U E Heimann, B H Lenz, R-D Hilgers, and G K Krieglstein
Reproducibility of circadian retinal and optic nerve head blood flow measurements by Heidelberg retina flowmetry
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2004; 88(3): 348 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M Sehi and J G Flanagan
The effect of image alignment on capillary blood flow measurement of the neuroretinal rim using the Heidelberg retina flowmeter
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2004; 88(2): 204 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
S. Loukovaara, M. Harju, R. Kaaja, and I. Immonen
Retinal Capillary Blood Flow in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Women during Pregnancy and Postpartum Period
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 1486 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
K. Gugleta, S. Orgul, I. Flammer, D. Gherghel, and J. Flammer
Reliability of Confocal Choroidal Laser Doppler Flowmetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 723 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology