HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kee, C.-s. Articles by Wallman, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kee, C.-s. Articles by Wallman, J.

Differences in Time Course and Visual Requirements of Ocular Responses to Lenses and Diffusers

From the Department of Biology, City College, City University of New York, NY.

PURPOSE. Myopia can be induced in chickens by having them wear either negative lenses (lens-compensation myopia [LCM]) or diffusers (form-deprivation myopia [FDM]), whereas positive lenses cause lens-compensation hyperopia (LCH). These three conditions were compared with respect to (i) their early time course and (ii) the effect of two manipulations of the lighting.

METHODS. Longitudinal changes in ocular dimensions and refractive error were measured in chicks maintained under three different conditions: (i) wearing either -15 D lenses or diffusers in a normal light/dark cycle; (ii) wearing either +15 D lenses, -15 D lenses, or diffusers with brief periods of stroboscopic lights at the beginning and end of the dark period; (iii) wearing either +6 D lenses, -6 D lenses, or diffusers with the nights interrupted by brief periods of white light. In addition, scleral and choroidal proteoglycan synthesis was measured in eyes that wore positive lenses, negative lenses, or diffusers for 3 hours followed by different periods of darkness.

RESULTS. (i) The time course of the changes in axial length over the first 72 hours was significantly faster in LCM than in FDM. Indeed, the diffusers did not begin to significantly affect the total length of the globe for 3 days, although the vitreous chamber had deepened after 9 hours, because the choroid thinned extremely rapidly (within 1 hour) with either diffusers or negative lenses. (ii) Scleral proteoglycan synthesis was higher in eyes with negative lenses than in those with diffusers at 11 hours, but the reverse was true at 27 hours. (iii) Brief periods of stroboscopic light attenuated FDM more than LCM. (iv) In contrast, interruption of the nights by brief periods of light attenuated LCM more than FDM. (v) Neither lighting manipulation affected LCH. (vi) Choroidal proteoglycan synthesis decreased similarly with 3 hours of wearing either diffusers or negative lenses.

CONCLUSIONS. Although both negative lenses and diffusers cause similar increases in the rate of ocular elongation, the responses differ in time course and in the effect of manipulations of the daily lighting. The responses to positive lenses differ from both of these.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X. Zhu and J. Wallman Temporal Properties of Compensation for Positive and Negative Spectacle Lenses in Chicks Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 37 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Ai, J. Li, H. Guan, and C. F. Wildsoet Emmetropization and Eye Growth in Young Aphakic Chickens Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 295 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hasebe, H. Ohtsuki, T. Nonaka, C. Nakatsuka, M. Miyata, I. Hamasaki, and S. Kimura Effect of Progressive Addition Lenses on Myopia Progression in Japanese Children: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked, Crossover Trial Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 2781 - 2789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-s. Kee and L. Deng Astigmatism Associated with Experimentally Induced Myopia or Hyperopia in Chickens Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 858 - 867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. McGlinn, D. A. Baldwin, J. W. Tobias, M. T. Budak, T. S. Khurana, and R. A. Stone Form-Deprivation Myopia in Chick Induces Limited Changes in Retinal Gene Expression Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 3430 - 3436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-s. Kee, L.-F. Hung, Y. Qiao-Grider, R. Ramamirtham, J. Winawer, J. Wallman, and E. L. Smith III Temporal Constraints on Experimental Emmetropization in Infant Monkeys Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 957 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. T. Norton, J. T. Siegwart Jr, and A. O. Amedo Effectiveness of Hyperopic Defocus, Minimal Defocus, or Myopic Defocus in Competition with a Myopiagenic Stimulus in Tree Shrew Eyes Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4687 - 4699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. T. Norton, A. O. Amedo, and J. T. Siegwart Jr Darkness Causes Myopia in Visually Experienced Tree Shrews Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4700 - 4707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Zhu, T. W. Park, J. Winawer, and J. Wallman In a Matter of Minutes, the Eye Can Know Which Way to Grow Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2238 - 2241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Smith III, L.-F. Hung, C.-s. Kee, and Y. Qiao Effects of Brief Periods of Unrestricted Vision on the Development of Form-Deprivation Myopia in Monkeys Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 291 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]