IOVS Heart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. I. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. I. W.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:614-619.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Relation between Size at Birth and Age-Related Cataract

Nigel F. Hall, Catharine R. Gale, Holly Syddall, Christopher N. Martyn and David I. W. Phillips

From the MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To determine whether poor fetal growth, as determined by size at birth, is associated with an increased risk of age-related cataract.

METHODS. A total of 741 men and women born in Sheffield, England between 1922 and 1930 and whose size at birth was available were traced and invited to take part in the study. Of these, 392 (53%) attended for ophthalmic examination. Lens opacity in these volunteers was graded using the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III.

RESULTS. After adjusting for age, gender, gestational age, and risk factors for cataract there were no consistent associations between size at birth and age-related cataract. However, the odds ratio for nuclear cataract (opalescence) among subjects whose birth weight was more than 8 lb was 2.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 5.0) compared with those who weighed under 6 lb 12 oz at birth. Risk of cortical cataract by contrast fell with increasing birth weight, but the trend was not significant and became weak after adjusting for gestational age and other risk factors for cataract. No relation was evident between risk of posterior subcapsular cataract and size at birth.

CONCLUSIONS. There is no consistent association between size at birth and age-related cataract. The higher risk of nuclear cataract with increased birth weight was contrary to the expected trend. The apparent difference in direction of the relation between birth weight and different subtypes of cataract may be a chance finding but warrants further exploration.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S-M Saw, L Tong, K-S Chia, D Koh, Y-S Lee, J Katz, and D T H Tan
The relation between birth size and the results of refractive error and biometry measurements in children
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2004; 88(4): 538 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. F. Hall, C. R. Gale, H. Syddall, C. N. Martyn, and D. I. W. Phillips
Relation between Size at Birth and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 3641 - 3645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology