HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miller, J. M. Articles by Sherrill, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, J. M. Articles by Sherrill, D. L.

Comparison of Preschool Vision Screening Methods in a Population with a High Prevalence of Astigmatism

¹ From the Departments of Ophthalmology and ³ Psychology, ² The Optical Sciences Center, and ⁴ The Respiratory Sciences Center, University of Arizona, Tucson.

PURPOSE. To compare the effectiveness of four methods of screening 3- to 5-year-old children for astigmatism high enough to require spectacle correction.

METHODS. Lea Symbols Visual Acuity Screening (LSVAS), MTI Photoscreening (MTIPS), Nidek KM-500 Keratometry Screening (KERS), and Retinomax K-Plus Noncycloplegic Autorefraction Screening (NCARS) were attempted on 379 preschool children who are members of a Native American tribe having a high prevalence of astigmatism that is primarily corneal in origin. The need for spectacle correction was determined by cycloplegic refraction. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were fit, confidence intervals were determined, and area under the curves was compared.

RESULTS. Astigmatism 1.00 D was present in the right eye of 47.5% and in the left eye of 48.0% of children. Spectacles were prescribed for children < 48 months of age who had cylinder 2.00 D and children 48 months who had cylinder 1.50 D, with the result that 33% of subjects required spectacles. Area under the ROC curve was 0.98 for NCARS, 0.92 for KERS, 0.78 for MTIPS, and 0.70 for LSVAS, and each of these values differed significantly from the other three (all P < 0.007). Testability was significantly higher for NCARS (99.5%) and KERS (99.7%) than for MTIPS (93.5%) and LSVAS (92.0%).

CONCLUSIONS. In a population that included many children with astigmatism, objective, fully automated screening methods (NCARS and KERS) were superior to both visual acuity screening and photoscreening with subjective interpretation in identifying children who had astigmatism requiring spectacle correction.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Tong, S.-M. Saw, Y. Lin, K.-S. Chia, D. Koh, and D. Tan Incidence and Progression of Astigmatism in Singaporean Children Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 3914 - 3918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D S P Fan, S K Rao, E Y Y Cheung, M Islam, S Chew, and D S C Lam Astigmatism in Chinese preschool children: prevalence, change, and effect on refractive development Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2004; 88(7): 938 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Cowen and W. R. Bobier The Pattern of Astigmatism in a Canadian Preschool Population Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 4593 - 4600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Miller, V. Dobson, E. M. Harvey, and D. L. Sherrill Cost-Efficient Vision Screening for Astigmatism in Native American Preschool Children Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 3756 - 3763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Williams, K Northstone, R A Harrad, J M Sparrow, and I Harvey Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2003; 87(8): 988 - 993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]