IOVS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schabereiter-Gurtner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Barisani-Asenbauer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schabereiter-Gurtner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Barisani-Asenbauer, T.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2001;42:1164-1171.)
© 2001 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

16S rDNA-Based Identification of Bacteria from Conjunctival Swabs by PCR and DGGE Fingerprinting

Claudia Schabereiter-Gurtner1, Saskia Maca2, Sabine Rölleke1, Karl Nigl2, Julius Lukas2, Alexander Hirschl3, Werner Lubitz1 and Talin Barisani-Asenbauer2

1 From the Institute of Microbiology and Genetics and 3 Department of Clinical Microbiology, University of Vienna, Austria; and 2 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.

PURPOSE. Establishment of a new molecular biology technique for the identification of multiple bacteria from the ocular environment, which can be applied supplementarily to cultivation in cases of severe bacterial infections.

METHODS. From 60 human conjunctivae (29 with purulent and 31 with nonpurulent conjunctivitis), swabs were taken and DNA was extracted. Fragments of 200 bp, spanning the V3 region of the eubacterial 16S rDNA, were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and separated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). For phylogenetic identification, DGGE bands were excised and directly sequenced, or 16S rDNA clone libraries were constructed and clones were screened by DGGE. Sequences were compared with sequences of known bacteria listed in the EMBL database. Furthermore, the results were compared with results obtained from conventional cultivation.

RESULTS. 16S rDNA could be amplified from 25 of 29 investigated swabs taken from purulent conjunctivitis eyes and from 2 of 31 investigated swabs taken from nonpurulent conjunctivitis eyes. Sixteen samples showed monomicrobial and 11 samples showed polymicrobial infections. The following genera (n is number of samples) were detected: Staphylococcus (n = 8), Corynebacterium (n = 7), Propionibacterium (n = 7), Streptococcus (n = 6), Bacillus (n = 2), Acinetobacter (n = 3), Pseudomonas (n = 3), Proteus (n = 1), and Brevundimonas (n = 1). Four sequences could not be identified to the genus level. They had highest sequence similarities both to sequences of Pantoea and Enterobacter (n = 1), Kingella and Neisseria (n = 1), Serratia and Aranicola (n = 1), and Leuconostoc and Weissella (n = 2), respectively. Culture was only positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 9), Corynebacteria (n = 3), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1), Streptococcus sp. (n = 1), Proteus sp. (n = 1), Klebsiella oxytoca (n = 1), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1). In total, 45% of the 60 analyzed conjunctival swabs were PCR positive, whereas only 22% were culture positive. No sample positive by culture gave negative results by PCR.

CONCLUSIONS. 16S rDNA sequence analyses and DGGE fingerprinting are appropriate methods for the detection and identification of monomicrobial as well as polymicrobial ocular infections of bacteria that might not be detected by conventional cultivation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
H. K. Kuramitsu, X. He, R. Lux, M. H. Anderson, and W. Shi
Interspecies Interactions within Oral Microbial Communities
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2007; 71(4): 653 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. E. Graham, J. E. Moore, X. Jiru, J. E. Moore, E. A. Goodall, J. S. G. Dooley, V. E. A. Hayes, D. A. Dartt, C. S. Downes, and T. C. B. Moore
Ocular Pathogen or Commensal: A PCR-Based Study of Surface Bacterial Flora in Normal and Dry Eyes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5616 - 5623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. Musovic, G. Oregaard, N. Kroer, and S. J. Sorensen
Cultivation-Independent Examination of Horizontal Transfer and Host Range of an IncP-1 Plasmid among Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria Indigenous to the Barley Rhizosphere.
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2006; 72(10): 6687 - 6692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
C. E. Davies, K. E. Hill, M. J. Wilson, P. Stephens, C. M. Hill, K. G. Harding, and D. W. Thomas
Use of 16S Ribosomal DNA PCR and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis for Analysis of the Microfloras of Healing and Nonhealing Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers
J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2004; 42(8): 3549 - 3557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
T. Spilker, T. Coenye, P. Vandamme, and J. J. LiPuma
PCR-Based Assay for Differentiation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Other Pseudomonas Species Recovered from Cystic Fibrosis Patients
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 2004; 42(5): 2074 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology