|
|
||||||||
1 From the Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth; 2 Lions Eye Institute, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia; 3 Ciba Vision, Basel, Switzerland; and the 4 University Eye Clinic, Strasbourg, France.
PURPOSE. To compare the vasoactive properties of the docosanoid unoprostone, its free acid, and different members of the prostanoid family on isolated perfused pig retinal arterioles to assess their potential to modulate retinal blood flow.
METHODS. Segments of porcine retinal arterioles were dissected, cannulated, and
perfused, and their diameter monitored during either intraluminal or
extraluminal application of increasing doses
(10-1010-4 M) of
either the docosanoid unoprostone isopropyl and its free acid or of
selected prostanoids: prostaglandin (PG) F2
and
thromboxane A2 analogue (U46619). Studies were
performed on arterioles in their uncontracted state, and also during
precontraction with endothelin-1 (10-9 M). The
significance of any induced change in vessel diameter was assessed in
relation to the initial vessel diameter or, in the case of endothelin-1
administration, to the contracted diameter with endothelin-1 alone.
RESULTS. In normal-tone arterioles without endothelin-1 contraction,
PGF2
and U46619 both produced a potent dose-dependent
contraction, but neither unoprostone isopropyl nor unoprostone free
acid had a significant vasoactive effect. In endothelin-1contracted
arterioles, U46619 produced further contraction, PGF2
produced a slight vasodilatation, and unoprostone isopropyl and its
free acid produced a pronounced dilatation.
CONCLUSIONS. Of the agents tested, unoprostone isopropyl and its free acid were the most potent vasodilators of endothelin-1contracted pig retinal arterioles. Members of the prostanoid family demonstrated a different effect on the diameter of isolated retinal arterioles compared with the docosanoids. The potential therefore exists for the docosanoid unoprostone to have a beneficial effect on retinal blood flow in addition to any reduction in intraocular pressure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Sugiyama, Y. Mashima, Y. Yoshioka, H. Oku, and T. Ikeda Effect of Unoprostone on Topographic and Blood Flow Changes in the Ischemic Optic Nerve Head of Rabbits Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2009; 127(4): 454 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Gilmore, C. Hudson, D. Preiss, and J. Fisher Retinal arteriolar diameter, blood velocity, and blood flow response to an isocapnic hyperoxic provocation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): H2912 - H2917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Hommer, B Kapik, and N Shams Unoprostone as adjunctive therapy to timolol: a double masked randomised study versus brimonidine and dorzolamide Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2003; 87(5): 592 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Polska, A. Doelemeyer, A. Luksch, P. Ehrlich, N. Kaehler, C. L. Percicot, G. N. Lambrou, and L. Schmetterer Partial Antagonism of Endothelin 1-Induced Vasoconstriction in the Human Choroid by Topical Unoprostone Isopropyl Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2002; 120(3): 348 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thieme, F. Stumpff, A. Ottlecz, C. L. Percicot, G. N. Lambrou, and M. Wiederholt Mechanisms of Action of Unoprostone on Trabecular Meshwork Contractility Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2001; 42(13): 3193 - 3201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |