HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Elliott, D. B. Articles by Whitaker, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Elliott, D. B. Articles by Whitaker, D.

Development of a Reading Speed Test for Potential-Vision Measurements

From the Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. Previous studies suggest that optimal reading speed is unaffected by cataract, yet is significantly reduced in age-related macular degeneration (ARMD ). This raises the question of whether a reading speed test could be developed to assess potential vision after cataract surgery.

METHODS. Nineteen subjects with cataract, 15 with ARMD, and 13 control subjects with normal, healthy eyes read Bailey-Lovie word charts aloud, and subsequently, critical print size and optimal reading speed were calculated. Measurements were also taken with the charts in reversed-contrast polarity and after pupillary dilation.

RESULTS. Although the subjects with cataract had reduced word acuity and increased critical print size, optimal reading speed was similar to that of the control group at a mean of approximately 100 wpm. Optimal reading speed in the subjects with ARMD was substantially worse (mean of 39 wpm). Reversing the contrast polarity of the charts slightly increased the word acuity and optimal reading speed of the subjects with cataract.

CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest that optimal reading speed would be useful as a potential-vision test. The proposed test would use text size of at least 1.32° (1.2 log minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), and pupil dilation would be unnecessary. A reading test with black letters on a white background would be adequate, because charts with reversed-contrast polarity made minimal difference in reading speed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. G. Gonzalez, L. Tarita-Nistor, S. N. Markowitz, and M. J. Steinbach Computer-Based Test to Measure Optimal Visual Acuity in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 4838 - 4845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A Douthwaite, M. Vianya-Estopa, and D. B Elliott Predictions of postoperative visual outcome in subjects with cataract: a preoperative and postoperative study Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2007; 91(5): 638 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Stifter, G Burggasser, E Hirmann, A Thaler, and W Radner Monocular and binocular reading performance in children with microstrabismic amblyopia Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2005; 89(10): 1324 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Stifter, S. Sacu, T. Benesch, and H. Weghaupt Impairment of Visual Acuity and Reading Performance and the Relationship with Cataract Type and Density Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 2071 - 2075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]