IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. I. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, D. I. W.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2002;43:3641-3645.)
© 2002 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Relation between Size at Birth and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Nigel F. Hall, Catharine R. Gale, Holly Syddall, Christopher N. Martyn and David I. W. Phillips

From the Medical Research Council Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To determine whether poor fetal growth, as determined by size at birth, is associated with increased risk of age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS. A total of 660 men and women born in Sheffield, United Kingdom, between 1922 and 1930 and whose size at birth was available were traced and invited to take part in the study. Of these, 392 attended for ophthalmic examination. Age-related macular degeneration in these volunteers was determined by the Wisconsin Age-Related Maculopathy Grading System.

RESULTS. The mean birth weight of subjects with macular degeneration (early or late) was heavier than that of those without (7.6 lb vs. 7.3 lb, respectively; P = 0.03). After adjustment for age, gender, and risk factors for macular degeneration, a significantly increased risk of macular degeneration was found in subjects with higher birth weight (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–2.0 for each SD [1 lb, 5 oz] increase in birth weight). Other parameters describing size at birth showed a weaker relation or no relation with macular degeneration, but one of the measures of fetal proportion (head circumference-to-birth weight ratio) was significantly associated with risk of macular degeneration. Subjects with macular degeneration had a significantly lower head circumference-to-birth weight ratio than did those without (11.2 vs. 12.0 respectively, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS. The finding that age-related macular degeneration was associated with increased rather than decreased birth weight was unexpected. Failure of the developing fetus’s normal brain-sparing mechanism is a possible explanation for our finding of a lower head circumference-to-birth weight ratio among subjects with macular degeneration.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
C. R. Gale, S. Walton, and C. N. Martyn
Foetal and postnatal head growth and risk of cognitive decline in old age
Brain, October 1, 2003; 126(10): 2273 - 2278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. R. Gale, N. F. Hall, D. I. W. Phillips, and C. N. Martyn
Lutein and Zeaxanthin Status and Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2003; 44(6): 2461 - 2465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology