IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steffen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zee, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steffen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Zee, D. S.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2002;43:668-672.)
© 2002 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Changes in Listing’s Plane after Sustained Vertical Fusion

Heimo Steffen1, Mark Walker1,2 and David S. Zee1,2

1 From the Departments of Neurology and 2 Ophthalmology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Pathology, Baltimore, Maryland.

PURPOSE. To determine whether prolonged fusion of an imposed vertical disparity leads to a change in the orientation of Listing’s plane, even when measured during monocular viewing.

METHODS. Four normal subjects (age range, 24–37 years) wore Fresnel prisms of increasing power for 72 hours to produce a final left-over-right disparity (range, 7–11 prism diopters [~3.9–6.2°]) that was still fusible. Eye movements were measured binocularly, using three-axis search coils, as subjects fixed on an array of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) arranged on a flat screen, 124 cm away. A regression was used to fit the data points to a plane (Listing’s plane) during monocular and binocular viewing. From each planar fit, the horizontal and vertical components of primary position (the direction of gaze that is perpendicular to Listing’s plane) were calculated. Baseline data were collected in the unadapted state, either just before or at least 4 days after wearing the prisms.

RESULTS. After the period of viewing through the prisms, there was a change in vertical phoria (prism adaptation) ranging from 1.6° to 3.3°. There was a significant (P < 0.01) shift of the relative orientation of the vertical component of primary position between the two eyes of 6.3 ± 1.7° (right eye value minus left eye, up being positive, each measured during monocular viewing). There was no consistent pattern of change in the horizontal component of primary position.

CONCLUSIONS. Prolonged fusion of a vertical disparity is associated with a change in the orientation of Listing’s plane that persists under monocular viewing. Possible mechanisms include phoria adaptation, the prolonged fusional effort itself, and the residual disparity that must be overcome by sensory mechanisms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Fesharaki, P. Karagiannis, D. Tweed, J. A. Sharpe, and A. M. F. Wong
Adaptive Neural Mechanism for Listing's Law Revealed in Patients with Skew Deviation Caused by Brainstem or Cerebellar Lesion
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 204 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. A. Migliaccio, P. D. Cremer, S. T. Aw, and G. M. Halmagyi
Vergence-Mediated Changes in Listing's Plane Do Not Occur in an Eye with Superior Oblique Palsy
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3043 - 3047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology