|
|
||||||||
1 From the Departments of Ophthalmology and 2 Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; the 4 Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and 3 Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California. 5 See Appendix for members of the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group.
PURPOSE. To characterize binocular visual acuity summation and inhibition in participants of a population-based ocular epidemiologic study.
METHODS. A complete ophthalmic examination of Latinos, aged 40 or more years, measured binocular and monocular distance visual acuities by a standard early-treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) protocol. The proportions of participants who demonstrated binocular summation (i.e., binocular visual acuity was better than the better eye visual acuity by five or more letters), binocular inhibition (i.e., binocular visual acuity was worse than the better eye visual acuity by five or more letters), and visual impairment (visual acuity worse than 20/40) were calculated.
RESULTS. In 1831 individuals, on average, binocular visual acuity was better than better eye visual acuity. Prevalence rates of binocular summation and inhibition were 21% and 2%, respectively. Compared with participants less than 65 years old or those with equivalent interocular visual acuity, older participants (
65 years) and those with interocular differences in visual acuity were more likely to demonstrate binocular inhibition (P < 0.01). The rate of visual impairment was significantly lower, when using binocular visual acuity than when using better eye or the American Medical Association (AMA) algorithm (5.2% vs. 6.9% and 9.5%, respectively P < 0.01). Participants with binocular inhibition had greater self-reported problems with driving activities (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS. The large proportion of individuals demonstrating binocular summation and inhibition suggests that in clinical or research settings, binocular visual acuity should be considered a primary measure of visual impairment, because it better equates the state in which the person usually functions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. H. Baker, T. S. Meese, B. Mansouri, and R. F. Hess Binocular Summation of Contrast Remains Intact in Strabismic Amblyopia Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 5332 - 5338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Owsley, G. McGwin, K. Scilley, G. C. Meek, A. Dyer, and D. Seker The Visual Status of Older Persons Residing in Nursing Homes Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 2007; 125(7): 925 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Balcer, S. L. Galetta, P. A. Calabresi, C. Confavreux, G. Giovannoni, E. Havrdova, M. Hutchinson, L. Kappos, F. D. Lublin, D. H. Miller, et al. Natalizumab reduces visual loss in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis Neurology, April 17, 2007; 68(16): 1299 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Globe, R. Varma, M. Torres, J. Wu, R. Klein, S. P. Azen, and for the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group Self-reported Comorbidities and Visual Function in a Population-Based Study: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 2005; 123(6): 815 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Balcer, M. L. Baier, J. A. Cohen, M. F. Kooijmans, A. W. Sandrock, M. L. Nano-Schiavi, D. C. Pfohl, M. Mills, J. Bowen, C. Ford, et al. Contrast letter acuity as a visual component for the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Neurology, November 25, 2003; 61(10): 1367 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Paz, D. R. Globe, J. Wu, S. P. Azen, and R. Varma Relationship Between Self-reported Depression and Self-reported Visual Function in Latinos Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 2003; 121(7): 1021 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Globe, R. Varma, S. P. Azen, S. Paz, E. Yu, S. Preston-Martin, and the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group Psychometric Performance of the NEI VFQ-25 in Visually Normal Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 1470 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |