IOVS AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garway-Heath, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hitchings, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garway-Heath, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hitchings, R. A.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2002;43:2213-2220.)
© 2002 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Relationship between Electrophysiological, Psychophysical, and Anatomical Measurements in Glaucoma

David F. Garway-Heath1, Graham E. Holder2, Fred W. Fitzke3 and Roger A. Hitchings1

1 From the Glaucoma Research Unit and the 2 Department of Electrophysiology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and the 3 Department of Visual Science, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. To evaluate the relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and structural measurements in normal and glaucomatous eyes and to test the hypothesis that there is a continuous structure–function relationship between ganglion cell numbers and visual field sensitivity.

METHODS. Thirty-four normal subjects and 40 patients with glaucoma were examined with the pattern electroretinogram (PERG), perimetry and retinal tomography. Transient and steady state (SS) PERGs were recorded, and peak (P)-to-trough (N) amplitude was measured. The unit of differential light sensitivity (DLS) in perimetry is the decibel. The decibel is 10 · log(1/Lambert), where the Lambert is the unit of test spot intensity. PERG amplitudes were correlated with decibel and 1/Lambert DLS for the central 18° of the visual field and with neuroretinal rim area in the temporal part of the optic disc. Age-related changes in the structural and functional measurements were sought. The correlation between variables was investigated by linear and quadratic regression analysis. A quadratic (y = ax + bx2 + c) fit was taken to be significantly better than a linear fit, if the coefficient (b) for the x2 term was significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS. A quadratic fit between decibel DLS and PERG amplitude (transient PERG: R2 = 0.40, P = 0.0000; SS PERG: R2 = 0.32, P = 0.0000) was significantly better than a linear fit. There was a linear correlation between 1/Lambert DLS and PERG amplitude (transient PERG: R2 = 0.44, P = 0.0000; SS PERG: R2 = 0.35, P = 0.0000). There was a linear correlation between temporal neuroretinal rim area and PERG amplitude (transient PERG: R2 = 0.17, P = 0.0003; SS PERG: R2 = 0.20, P = 0.0001). A quadratic fit between decibel DLS and temporal neuroretinal rim area (R2 = 0.38, P = 0.0000) was significantly better than a linear fit. There was a linear correlation between 1/Lambert DLS and temporal neuroretinal rim area (R2 = 0.30, P = 0.0000). Both DLS and PERG amplitude declined with age in the normal subjects. The rate of decline was -0.17%, -0.74%, -0.75%, and -0.78% per year for decibel DLS, 1/Lambert DLS, transient PERG, and SS PERG, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS. There is a curvilinear relationship between decibel DLS and both PERG amplitude and neuroretinal rim area, and a linear relationship between 1/Lambert DLS and PERG amplitude and neuroretinal rim area. These findings support the hypothesis that there is no ganglion cell functional reserve but a continuous structure–function relationship, and that the impression of a functional reserve results from the logarithmic (decibel) scaling of the visual field.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Hot, M. W. Dul, and W. H. Swanson
Development and Evaluation of a Contrast Sensitivity Perimetry Test for Patients with Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 3049 - 3057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Machida, Y. Gotoh, Y. Toba, A. Ohtaki, M. Kaneko, and D. Kurosaka
Correlation between Photopic Negative Response and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Optic Disc Topography in Glaucomatous Eyes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 2201 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Boden, K. Chan, P. A. Sample, J. Hao, T.-W. Lee, L. M. Zangwill, R. N. Weinreb, and M. H. Goldbaum
Assessing Visual Field Clustering Schemes Using Machine Learning Classifiers in Standard Perimetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5582 - 5590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. K.-s. Leung, F. A. Medeiros, L. M. Zangwill, P. A. Sample, C. Bowd, D. Ng, C. Y. L. Cheung, D. S. C. Lam, and R. N. Weinreb
American Chinese Glaucoma Imaging Study: A Comparison of the Optic Disc and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Detecting Glaucomatous Damage
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2644 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
H. K. Falkenberg and P. J. Bex
Sources of Motion-Sensitivity Loss in Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2913 - 2921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. A. Mai, N. J. Reus, and H. G. Lemij
Structure-Function Relationship Is Stronger with Enhanced Corneal Compensation than with Variable Corneal Compensation in Scanning Laser Polarimetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1651 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
V. Porciatti, M. Saleh, and M. Nagaraju
The Pattern Electroretinogram as a Tool to Monitor Progressive Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction in the DBA/2J Mouse Model of Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 745 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. M. Ventura, N. Sorokac, R. D. L. Santos, W. J. Feuer, and V. Porciatti
The Relationship between Retinal Ganglion Cell Function and Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness in Early Glaucoma.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 3904 - 3911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Bowd, L. M. Zangwill, F. A. Medeiros, I. M. Tavares, E. M. Hoffmann, R. R. Bourne, P. A. Sample, and R. N. Weinreb
Structure-function relationships using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, optical coherence tomography, and scanning laser polarimetry.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 2889 - 2895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. J. Reus and H. G. Lemij
Relationships between Standard Automated Perimetry, HRT Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy, and GDx VCC Scanning Laser Polarimetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 4182 - 4188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. K.-s. Leung, K. K.-L. Chong, W.-m. Chan, C. K.-F. Yiu, M.-y. Tso, J. Woo, M.-K. Tsang, K.-k. Tse, and W.-h. Yung
Comparative Study of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: Structure/Function Regression Analysis in Glaucoma
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3702 - 3711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
E. A. Essock, Y. Zheng, and P. Gunvant
Analysis of GDx-VCC Polarimetry Data by Wavelet-Fourier Analysis across Glaucoma Stages
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 2838 - 2847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. C. Hood, L. Xu, P. Thienprasiddhi, V. C. Greenstein, J. G. Odel, T. M. Grippo, J. M. Liebmann, and R. Ritch
The Pattern Electroretinogram in Glaucoma Patients with Confirmed Visual Field Deficits
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2411 - 2418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
G. Wollstein, J. S. Schuman, L. L. Price, A. Aydin, P. C. Stark, E. Hertzmark, E. Lai, H. Ishikawa, C. Mattox, J. G. Fujimoto, et al.
Optical Coherence Tomography Longitudinal Evaluation of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Glaucoma
Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2005; 123(4): 464 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
V. C. Greenstein, P. Thienprasiddhi, R. Ritch, J. M. Liebmann, and D. C. Hood
A Method for Comparing Electrophysiological, Psychophysical, and Structural Measures of Glaucomatous Damage
Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2004; 122(9): 1276 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
P. G. Schlottmann, S. De Cilla, D. S. Greenfield, J. Caprioli, and D. F. Garway-Heath
Relationship between Visual Field Sensitivity and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness as Measured by Scanning Laser Polarimetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1823 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. J. Reus and H. G. Lemij
The Relationship between Standard Automated Perimetry and GDx VCC Measurements
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 840 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
W. H. Swanson, J. Felius, and F. Pan
Perimetric Defects and Ganglion Cell Damage: Interpreting Linear Relations Using a Two-Stage Neural Model
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 466 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. Fortune, L. Wang, B. V. Bui, G. Cull, J. Dong, and G. A. Cioffi
Local Ganglion Cell Contributions to the Macaque Electroretinogram Revealed by Experimental Nerve Fiber Layer Bundle Defect
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 4567 - 4579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology