IOVS AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kukkonen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Raninen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kukkonen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Raninen, A.
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2002;43:3131-3135.)
© 2002 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Noise Frame Duration, Masking Potency and Whiteness of Temporal Noise

Heljä Kukkonen1, Jyrki Rovamo1, Kristian Donner2, Marja Tammikallio2 and Antti Raninen2

1 From the Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom; and the 2 Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

PURPOSE. Because of the limited contrast range, increasing the duration of the noise frame is often the only option for increasing the masking potency of external, white temporal noise. This, however, reduces the high-frequency cutoff beyond which noise is no longer white. This study was conducted to determine the longest noise frame duration that produces the strongest masking effect and still mimics white noise on the detection of sinusoidal flicker.

METHODS. Contrast energy thresholds (Eth) were measured for flicker at 1.25 to 20 Hz in strong, purely temporal (spatially uniform), additive, external noise. The masking power of white external noise, characterized by its spectral density at zero frequency N0, increases with the duration of the noise frame.

RESULTS. For short noise frame durations, Eth increased in direct proportion to N0, keeping the nominal signal-to-noise ratio [SNR = (Eth/N0)0.5] constant at threshold. The masking effect thus increased with the duration of the noise frame and the noise mimicked white noise. When noise frame duration and N0 increased further, the nominal SNR at threshold started to decrease, indicating that noise no longer mimicked white noise. The minimum number of noise frames per flicker cycle needed to mimic white noise decreased with increasing flicker frequency from 8.3 at 1.25 Hz to 1.6 at 20 Hz.

CONCLUSIONS. The critical high-frequency cutoff of detection-limiting temporal noise in terms of noise frames per signal cycle depends on the temporal frequency of the signal. This is opposite to the situation in the spatial domain and must be taken into consideration when temporal signals are masked with temporal noise.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. Rovamo, H. Kukkonen, A. Raninen, and K. Donner
Efficiency of Temporal Integration of Sinusoidal Flicker
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 5049 - 5055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology