|
|
||||||||
1From the Departments of Neurology and 3Ophthalmology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; and the 2Departments of Neurology and 5OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery and the 4Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
PURPOSE. In ocular kinematics, the primary position (PP) of the eye is defined by the position from which movements do not induce ocular rotations around the line of sight (Helmholtz). PP is mathematically linked to the orientation of Listings plane. This study was conducted to determine whether PP is affected differently in patients with clinically diagnosed congenital (conTNP) and acquired (acqTNP) trochlear nerve palsy.
METHODS. Patients with unilateral conTNP (n = 25) and acqTNP (n = 9) performed a modified Hess screen test. Three-dimensional eye positions were recorded with dual search coils.
RESULTS. PP in eyes with acqTNP was significantly more temporal (mean: 21.2°) than in eyes with conTNP (6.8°) or healthy eyes (7.2°). In the pooled data of all patients, the horizontal location of PP significantly correlated with vertical noncomitance with the paretic eye in adduction (R = 0.59). Using a computer model, PP in acqTNP could be reproduced by a neural lesion of the superior oblique (SO) muscle. An additional simulated overaction of the inferior oblique (IO) muscle moved PP back to normal, as in conTNP. Lengthening the SO and shortening the IO muscles could also simulate PP in conTNP.
CONCLUSIONS. The temporal displacement of PP in acqTNP is a direct consequence of the reduced force of the SO muscle. The reversal of this temporal displacement of PP, which occurs in some patients with conTNP, can be explained by a secondary overaction of the IO muscle. Alternatively, length changes in the SO and IO muscles, or other anatomic anomalies within the orbit, without a neural lesion, may also explain the difference in location of PP between conTNP and acqTNP.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Liao, J. Wagner, A. Joshi, I. Estrovich, M. F. Walker, M. Strupp, and R. J. Leigh Why do patients with PSP fall?: Evidence for abnormal otolith responses Neurology, March 4, 2008; 70(10): 802 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Shan, J. Tian, H. S. Ying, C. Quaia, L. M. Optican, M. F. Walker, R. J. Tamargo, and D. S. Zee Acute Superior Oblique Palsy in Monkeys: I. Changes in Static Eye Alignment Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2602 - 2611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tian, X. Shan, D. S. Zee, H. Ying, R. J. Tamargo, C. Quaia, L. M. Optican, and M. F. Walker Acute Superior Oblique Palsy in Monkeys: III. Relationship to Listing's Law Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2621 - 2625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Migliaccio, P. D. Cremer, S. T. Aw, and G. M. Halmagyi Vergence-Mediated Changes in Listing's Plane Do Not Occur in an Eye with Superior Oblique Palsy Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3043 - 3047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |