IOVS Clinical Microbiology Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:4762-4771.)
© 2003 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.03-0259

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hess, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Malin, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hess, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Malin, S. A.

Threshold Vision in Amblyopia: Orientation and Phase

Robert F. Hess1,2 and Sam A. Malin3

1From the McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 2The School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; and 3The Physiological Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. The visual deficit in amblyopia involves both elevated contrast thresholds and distorted suprathreshold percepts at high spatial frequencies. It is currently unclear whether these two anomalies are part of the same neural disturbance or whether they reflect different neural dysfunction.

METHODS. The quality of the spatial percepts in amblyopia was assessed at detection threshold. The ability of amblyopes to discriminate the orientation and local spatial phase of well-localized spatial stimuli was measured at the detection threshold. Measurements were made as a function of spatial frequency.

RESULTS. Performance seemed normal for orientation discrimination, even at high spatial frequencies, but, in some cases, it was disturbed in phase discrimination.

CONCLUSIONS. A different explanation and neural basis is needed to encompass both threshold and suprathreshold spatial deficits in amblyopia.








HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology