| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School and the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts; the 2Center for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Veterans Administration Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the 3Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the 4Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and the 5Nanofabrication Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
PURPOSE. This work is part of a feasibility assessment of a retinal prosthesis as a means to restore vision to patients with blindness caused by retinitis pigmentosa. The primary goal was to assess the concordance of the form of induced perception and the pattern of electrical stimulation of the retina, and the reproducibility of the responses.
METHODS. Five volunteers with severe retinitis pigmentosa and one with normal vision were studied. A companion paper in this issue provides details on demographics, visual function, surgical methods, general stimulation strategy, and data analysis. Volunteers were awake during surgery while a 10-µm-thick, microfabricated electrode array was placed on the retina. The array was connected to extraocular current sources that delivered charges to 50-, 100-, and 400-µm-diameter electrodes. Negative control trials were randomly included. Perceptual quality was judged by the similarity between the form of stimulation and perception (i.e., accuracy) and the reproducibility of responses.
RESULTS. Only 1 of 40 control tests yielded a false-positive result. On average, volunteers 3, 5, and 6 reported percepts that matched the stimulation pattern 48% and 32% of the time for single- and multiple-electrode trials, respectively. Two-point discrimination in the best cases may have been achieved in two blind subjects using (center-to-center) electrode separation of 600 and 1960 µm. Reproducibility was achieved 66% of the time in the blind subjects. By comparison, in the normal-sighted subject, perceptual form was reported accurately 57% of the time, with 82% reproducibility, and two-point discrimination may have been achieved in one trial with 620-µm electrode spacing and in two trials each with 1860- and 2480-µm electrode spacing. In subjects 5 and 6, perceptual size was inconsistently related to the charge, although relatively large differences in charge (median: 0.55 microcoulombs [µC]) between two trials produced differently sized percepts. Longer stimuli did not produce rounder percepts.
CONCLUSIONS. Single percepts induced by single-electrode stimulation were relatively small, but the form of percepts, especially after multielectrode stimulation, often did not match the stimulation pattern, even in a normal-sighted volunteer. Reproducible percepts were more easily generated than those that matched the stimulation pattern.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. I. Fried, A. C. W. Lasker, N. J. Desai, D. K. Eddington, and J. F. Rizzo 3rd Axonal Sodium-Channel Bands Shape the Response to Electric Stimulation in Retinal Ganglion Cells J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1972 - 1987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Horsager, S. H. Greenwald, J. D. Weiland, M. S. Humayun, R. J. Greenberg, M. J. McMahon, G. M. Boynton, and I. Fine Predicting Visual Sensitivity in Retinal Prosthesis Patients Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2009; 50(4): 1483 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. de Balthasar, S. Patel, A. Roy, R. Freda, S. Greenwald, A. Horsager, M. Mahadevappa, D. Yanai, M. J. McMahon, M. S. Humayun, et al. Factors Affecting Perceptual Thresholds in Epiretinal Prostheses Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2303 - 2314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Okawa, T. Fujikado, T. Miyoshi, H. Sawai, S. Kusaka, T. Mihashi, Y. Hirohara, and Y. Tano Optical Imaging to Evaluate Retinal Activation by Electrical Currents Using Suprachoroidal-Transretinal Stimulation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 4777 - 4784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Scholz Perspectives on: Materials Aspects for Retinal Prostheses Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, September 1, 2007; 22(5): 539 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Matsuo and N. Morimoto Visual acuity and perimacular retinal layers detected by optical coherence tomography in patients with retinitis pigmentosa Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2007; 91(7): 888 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Salzmann, O P Linderholm, J-L Guyomard, M Paques, M Simonutti, M Lecchi, J Sommerhalder, E Dubus, M Pelizzone, D Bertrand, et al. Subretinal electrode implantation in the P23H rat for chronic stimulations Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2006; 90(9): 1183 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Montezuma, J. Loewenstein, C. Scholz, and J. F. Rizzo III Biocompatibility of materials implanted into the subretinal space of yucatan pigs. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 3514 - 3522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Sekirnjak, P. Hottowy, A. Sher, W. Dabrowski, A. M. Litke, and E. J. Chichilnisky Electrical Stimulation of Mammalian Retinal Ganglion Cells With Multielectrode Arrays J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3311 - 3327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Dagnelie, D. Barnett, M. S. Humayun, and R. W. Thompson Jr Paragraph text reading using a pixelized prosthetic vision simulator: parameter dependence and task learning in free-viewing conditions. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 1241 - 1250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. I. Fried, H. A. Hsueh, and F. S. Werblin A Method for Generating Precise Temporal Patterns of Retinal Spiking Using Prosthetic Stimulation J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 970 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P. Fornos, J. Sommerhalder, B. Rappaz, A. B. Safran, and M. Pelizzone Simulation of Artificial Vision, III: Do the Spatial or Temporal Characteristics of Stimulus Pixelization Really Matter? Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3906 - 3912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Jensen, O. R. Ziv, and J. F. Rizzo III Thresholds for Activation of Rabbit Retinal Ganglion Cells with Relatively Large, Extracellular Microelectrodes Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1486 - 1496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Palanker, P. Huie, A. Vankov, R. Aramant, M. Seiler, H. Fishman, M. Marmor, and M. Blumenkranz Migration of Retinal Cells through a Perforated Membrane: Implications for a High-Resolution Prosthesis Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3266 - 3270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. I. Loewenstein, S. R. Montezuma, and J. F. Rizzo III Outer Retinal Degeneration: An Electronic Retinal Prosthesis as a Treatment Strategy Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 2004; 122(4): 587 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Rizzo III, J. Wyatt, J. Loewenstein, S. Kelly, and D. Shire Methods and Perceptual Thresholds for Short-Term Electrical Stimulation of Human Retina with Microelectrode Arrays Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 5355 - 5361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
