IOVS Drug Metabolism and Disposition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:875-878.)
© 2003 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.01-1101

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crow, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Feldon, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crow, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Feldon, S. E.

Sweep Visual Evoked Potential Evaluation of Contrast Sensitivity in Alzheimer’s Dementia

Robert W. Crow,1 Lori B. Levin,2 Laurie LaBree,3 Richard Rubin,4 and Steven E. Feldon2,5

1From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; the 2Department of Ophthalmology and the Doheny Eye Institute, the 3Department of Preventive Medicine Statistical Consultation and Research Center, and the 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California; and the 4Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate primary afferent visual pathway function by objectively testing contrast sensitivity in persons with Alzheimer’s dementia (AD), using a sweep visual evoked potential technique.

METHODS. Twenty-five patients, 16 with AD and 9 elderly control (EC) subjects, were enrolled from the University of Southern California Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center. The patients with AD had clinical dementia ratings ranging from 0.5 to 3, corresponding to mild to moderate disease. All participants underwent refraction and screening for ophthalmic disease. Subjects were evaluated with the sweep visual evoked potential technique. Each trial consisted of logarithmically increasing contrast over a 10-second period. Subjects were evaluated monocularly at spatial frequencies of 1, 5, and 8 cyc/deg. Patients were not required to integrate and respond to stimuli.

RESULTS. Mean contrast sensitivity thresholds were significantly higher in patients with AD than in EC subjects. The mean contrast sensitivities in the AD group were 4.0%, 9.6%, and 18.6%, at 1, 5, and 8 cyc/deg, respectively. The corresponding sensitivities in the EC group were 2.1%, 5.3%, and 11.4%, at 1, 5, and 8 cyc/deg, respectively. These threshold differences were significant at probabilities of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.07. There was no correlation between clinical dementia ratings and reduction of contrast sensitivity thresholds. Confounding factors such as age, gender, nuclear sclerosis, and visual acuity were evaluated. Visual acuity was the only factor significantly different between AD responders and AD nonresponders at 1 and 5 cyc/deg.

CONCLUSIONS. These results suggest patients with AD have deficits in contrast sensitivity attributable to dysfunction of the primary afferent visual pathway.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
V. Kavcic, R. Fernandez, D. Logan, and C. J. Duffy
Neurophysiological and perceptual correlates of navigational impairment in Alzheimer's disease
Brain, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 736 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
F. M. John, N. R. Bromham, J. M. Woodhouse, and T. R. Candy
Spatial Vision Deficits in Infants and Children with Down Syndrome
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 1566 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology