IOVS Is this journal stale?
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:1395-1400.)
© 2003 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.02-0625

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simmers, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simmers, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, R. F.

Perceived Blur in Amblyopia

Anita J. Simmers, Peter J. Bex, and Robert F. Hess

From The Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; and McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

PURPOSE. The well-documented fact that visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in amblyopia are attenuated at high spatial frequencies predicts that amblyopes should perceive objects as blurred, because they do not have the high spatial frequency information necessary to represent sharp edges adequately. In the current study, the representation of blur in amblyopia with blur-discrimination and blur-matching tasks was explored in a series of experiments.

METHODS. Monocular blur-discrimination thresholds were measured in a spatial two-alternative forced-choice procedure. Observers were required to discriminate which edge (right or left) appeared to be the lesser blurred. Observers also interocularly matched edges that were identical with those used in the blur-discrimination tasks, with the exception that they were viewed dichoptically at all times.

RESULTS. Blur-discrimination thresholds were elevated in both the amblyopic and fellow fixing eyes but were within the normal range for interocular matching thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest that blur is veridically represented in the amblyopic visual system. The surprising result is that all amblyopes, even those with the most severe visual loss, veridically matched all blurred edges, including the sharpest ones. This implies that amblyopes are able to represent levels of blur that are defined by spatial structure beyond their resolution limit.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C.-B. Huang, Y. Zhou, and Z.-L. Lu
Broad bandwidth of perceptual learning in the visual system of adults with anisometropic amblyopia
PNAS, March 11, 2008; 105(10): 4068 - 4073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J E Hale, S Murjaneh, N A Frost, and R A Harrad
How should we manage an amblyopic patient with cataract?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2006; 90(2): 132 - 133.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology