HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hahn, S. Articles by the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hahn, S. Articles by the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group,

Central Corneal Thickness in Latinos

¹From the Department of Ophthalmology and the ²Statistical Consultation and Research Center, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

PURPOSE. To characterize central corneal thickness (CCT) in Latinos aged 40 or more years.

METHODS. A population-based cohort of Latinos from two census tracts in La Puente, California, underwent measurements of CCT and intraocular pressure (IOP). CCT was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter, and IOP was measured by applanation tonometry. One eye of each of 1699 participants was included in the analyses.

RESULTS. The mean (±SD) CCT was 546.9 ± 33.5 µm. Older participants (≥70 years) had significantly thinner CCs compared with participants 40 to 49 years of age (P < 0.05). Eyes with ocular hypertension had thicker CCs than did normal and glaucomatous eyes (P < 0.05). Multivariate adaptive regression spline analyses and analysis of variance contrasting IOP subgroups revealed that eyes with thinner CCs had lower IOP than did eyes with thicker CCs (P < 0.001). The absolute range of interocular differences in CCT in the same subject was as high as 24 µm.

CONCLUSIONS. On average, CCT in Latinos was less than that previously reported in whites but greater than that reported in African Americans and Asians. Older Latinos had thinner corneas compared with younger Latinos. Asymmetry in CCT of 25 µm or more should be evaluated for potential corneal disease. Spline analyses suggest that although the relationship between IOP and CCT is best explained by a nonlinear equation, when measuring IOP with the Goldmann tonometer, it is likely that IOP is underestimated in eyes with thinner CCs and overestimated in eyes with thicker CCs.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. J. Casson, L. M. Abraham, H. S. Newland, J. Muecke, T. Sullivan, D. Selva, and T. Aung Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure in a Nonglaucomatous Burmese Population: The Meiktila Eye Study Arch Ophthalmol, July 1, 2008; 126(7): 981 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Tong, S.-M. Saw, J.-K. Siak, G. Gazzard, and D. Tan Corneal Thickness Determination and Correlates in Singaporean Schoolchildren Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2004; 45(11): 4004 - 4009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]