|
|
||||||||
1From the Departments of Ophthalmology, 2Neurology, and 3Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University and The Research Institute of University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio.
PURPOSE. The phenotypically novel extraocular muscles (EOMs) exhibit fundamental differences in innervation and neuromuscular junction (NMJ) morphology from other skeletal muscles. In the current study, the morphology and molecular organization of NMJs of EOM singly innervated (SIF) and multiply innervated (MIF) fiber types were evaluated and the distribution of molecules involved in formation and maintenance of NMJs were specifically characterized.
METHODS. Adult mouse EOM NMJ organization was examined by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Differential cellular localization of components of two established synaptic signaling pathways, (1) neuregulin and erbB receptors 2, 3, and 4 and (2) agrin, MuSK, and rapsyn and select NMJ-associated structural proteins were studied for EOM SIF and MIF populations. Endplate topography and structure were also studied, using both confocal microscopy and transmission electron microscopy, with NMJ morphologic organization correlated with specific EOM fiber types.
RESULTS. Confocal fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that, for NMJs of both EOM SIFs and MIFs, components of neuregulin and agrin pathways and the major components of the junctional dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC) colocalized with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) aggregates. However, EOM exhibited novel fiber-typespecific extrasynaptic localization of two key DGC signaling-related molecules:
-dystrobrevin 1 (global MIFs) and syntrophin ß1 (global MIFs and orbital MIFs and SIFs).
CONCLUSIONS. The data establish that the molecular organization of EOM SIF and MIF NMJs includes the same signaling and structural molecules previously characterized for other skeletal muscles. By contrast, divergence in other aspects of the synaptic and nonsynaptic sarcolemmal organization of EOM fiber types may underlie the unique responses of these muscles in a variety of neuromuscular disorders.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. M. Vock, O. N. Ponomareva, and M. Rimer Evidence for Muscle-Dependent Neuromuscular Synaptic Site Determination in Mammals J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 3123 - 3130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Lefebvre, L. Jing, S. Becaficco, C. Franzini-Armstrong, and M. Granato Differential requirement for MuSK and dystroglycan in generating patterns of neuromuscular innervation PNAS, February 13, 2007; 104(7): 2483 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fraterman, T. S. Khurana, and N. A. Rubinstein Identification of acetylcholine receptor subunits differentially expressed in singly and multiply innervated fibers of extraocular muscles. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 3828 - 3834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Khanna, G. Cheng, B. Gong, M. J. Mustari, and J. D. Porter Genome-Wide Transcriptional Profiles Are Consistent with Functional Specialization of the Extraocular Muscle Layers Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3055 - 3066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cheng, A. P. Merriam, B. Gong, P. Leahy, S. Khanna, and J. D. Porter Conserved and muscle-group-specific gene expression patterns shape postnatal development of the novel extraocular muscle phenotype Physiol Genomics, July 8, 2004; 18(2): 184 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Porter, A. P. Merriam, B. Gong, S. Kasturi, X. Zhou, K. F. Hauser, F. H. Andrade, and G. Cheng Postnatal suppression of myomesin, muscle creatine kinase and the M-line in rat extraocular muscle J. Exp. Biol., September 1, 2003; 206(17): 3101 - 3112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |