HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McKeefry, D. J. Articles by Murray, I. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McKeefry, D. J. Articles by Murray, I. J.

Simple Reaction Times in Color Space: The Influence of Chromaticity, Contrast, and Cone Opponency

¹From the Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom; the ²Vision Science Centre, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; the ³Visual Sciences Laboratory, Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. This study examined the influence of stimulus chromaticity on simple reaction times (RTs) to determine the stage of chromatic processing that is most influential in their generation.

METHODS. Simple RTs were measured in response to the cosinusoidally ramped onset of small, equiluminant, colored Gaussian spots. The chromaticity of these stimuli was varied, to modulate along a series of vectors in color space that included red-green (L-M) and blue-yellow (S-[L+M]) opponent axes.

RESULTS. RTs are highly sensitive to small departures from subjective equiluminance. They are also dependent on stimulus chromaticity. The longest RTs are generated in response to equiluminant stimuli that isolate S-cone activity, whereas the shortest are generated by stimuli that modulate the L-M opponent axis. However, temporal processing differences are highly dependent on how the chromatic stimuli are scaled in relation to one another. The differences are reduced when scaling is based on detection threshold. The relationship between chromatic contrast and RT can be described by the modified Piéron equation RT = RT₀ + k · C^-1.

CONCLUSIONS. Simple RTs generated in this study conform to the idea that they are largely determined by cone-opponency mechanisms. The use of cone contrast as a metric for scaling chromatic stimuli exaggerates differences between the temporal responsiveness of L-M and S-(L+M) opponency mechanisms.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. O'Donell and E. Colombo Simple reaction times to chromatic stimuli: Luminance and chromatic contrast Lighting Research and Technology, December 1, 2008; 40(4): 359 - 371. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Walkey, P. Orrevetelainen, J. Barbur, L. Halonen, T. Goodman, J. Alferdinck, A. Freiding, and A. Szalmas Mesopic visual efficiency II: reaction time experiments Lighting Research and Technology, December 1, 2007; 39(4): 335 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Jaworski, A. Gentle, A. J. Zele, A. J. Vingrys, and N. A. McBrien Altered visual sensitivity in axial high myopia: a local postreceptoral phenomenon? Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 3695 - 3702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Leh, H. Johansen-Berg, and A. Ptito Unconscious vision: new insights into the neuronal correlate of blindsight using diffusion tractography Brain, July 1, 2006; 129(7): 1822 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Taylor, R. H. S. Carpenter, and A. J. Anderson A noisy transform predicts saccadic and manual reaction times to changes in contrast J. Physiol., June 15, 2006; 573(3): 741 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Remky and A E Elsner Blue on yellow perimetry with scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in patients with age related macular disease Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2005; 89(4): 464 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]