IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:2524-2528.)
© 2003 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.02-0731
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, L.

Precorneal and Pre- and Postlens Tear Film Thickness Measured Indirectly with Optical Coherence Tomography

Jianhua Wang, Desmond Fonn, Trefford L. Simpson, and Lyndon Jones

From the Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

PURPOSE. To demonstrate the feasibility of indirectly measuring the precorneal tear film thickness and pre- and postlens tear film (PLTF) thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS. Central corneal thickness (C1) which includes the tear film (T) of both eyes of 40 non–contact lens wearers was measured using OCT after calibration. The mean age of the 40 subjects was 31.2 ± 9.3 years with a mean horizontal K-reading of 7.87 mm. Rigid contact lenses with base curves 0.3- to 0.5-mm steeper than the flattest K of the eye were fitted to measure real corneal thickness (C2), independently of the postlens tear film. T was calculated by T = C1 - C2. To measure pre- and postlens tear film thickness, Focus Night & Day and Acuvue lenses (Vistakon, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, FL) were fitted on both eyes. Central soft lens thickness (L1), which includes the prelens tear film (P), was measured by OCT in situ and in saline in a wet cell (L2). P was calculated by P = L1 - L2. Thickness of the central cornea plus the postlens tear film (C3) was measured during lens wearing. Postlens tear film (PLTF) was calculated by PLTF = C3 - C2.

RESULTS. The mean ± SD precorneal tear film thickness was 3.3 ± 1.5 µm (range, 0–6.9) before lens insertion and 4.7 ± 2.3 µm (range, 0.7–11.0) after lens fitting, which was significantly thicker (paired t-test: P < 0.01). The prelens tear film thickness was 3.9 ± 2.6 and 3.6 ± 2.1 µm (mean ± SD; paired t-test: P = 0.52) and the postlens tear film thickness was 4.5 ± 2.3 and 4.7 ± 3.1 µm (paired t-test: P = 0.08) on and under Focus Night & Day and Acuvue lenses, respectively. Post hoc tests showed that precorneal (baseline) and prelens tear films were equivalent, and each was different (thinner; Tukey honestly significant difference P < 0.05) from the postlens tear film.

CONCLUSIONS. OCT can noninvasively measure the thickness of the precorneal and prelens tear film as well as the postlens tear film. The thickness of the normal precorneal tear film is approximately 3 µm and becomes thicker after lens fitting. The postlens tear film is thicker than the precorneal and prelens tear films with soft contact lenses. The thickness of both pre- and postlens tear films appears to be independent of the investigated lens types.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. R. Lewis, A. E. Knellinger, A. M. Mahmoud, and T. F. Mauger
Effect of Soft Contact Lenses on Optical Measurements of Axial Length and Keratometry for Biometry in Eyes with Corneal Irregularities
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 3371 - 3378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. Wang, J. Aquavella, J. Palakuru, S. Chung, and C. Feng
Relationships between Central Tear Film Thickness and Tear Menisci of the Upper and Lower Eyelids.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 4349 - 4355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. Moreno-Montanes, A. Alvarez, and M. J. Maldonado
Objective Quantification of Posterior Capsule Opacification after Cataract Surgery, with Optical Coherence Tomography
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 3999 - 4006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
H. Saaren-Seppala, M. Jauhiainen, T. M. T. Tervo, B. Redl, P. K. J. Kinnunen, and J. M. Holopainen
Interaction of Purified Tear Lipocalin with Lipid Membranes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3649 - 3656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. J. Nichols, G. L. Mitchell, and P. E. King-Smith
Thinning Rate of the Precorneal and Prelens Tear Films
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2353 - 2361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. Wang, T. L. Simpson, and D. Fonn
Objective Measurements of Corneal Light-Backscatter during Corneal Swelling, by Optical Coherence Tomography
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 3493 - 3498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
M. J. Glasson, F. Stapleton, L. Keay, D. Sweeney, and M. D. P. Willcox
Differences in Clinical Parameters and Tear Film of Tolerant and Intolerant Contact Lens Wearers
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 5116 - 5124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology