IOVS Molecular Human Reproduction
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:2818-2827.)
© 2003 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.02-0606

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wallman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Wallman, J.

Potency of Myopic Defocus in Spectacle Lens Compensation

Xiaoying Zhu,1 Jonathan A. Winawer,1,2 and Josh Wallman1

1From the Department of Biology, City College of the City University of New York, New York, New York.

PURPOSE. Previous studies have shown that chick eyes compensate for positive or negative lenses worn for brief periods if the chicks are in darkness the remainder of the time. This study was undertaken to determine whether chicks can compensate for brief periods of lens wear if given unrestricted vision the remainder of the time. Previous studies have also shown that chick eyes alternately wearing positive and negative lenses for brief periods compensate for the positive lenses. The current study sought to determine whether brief periods of positive lens wear can outweigh daylong wearing of negative lenses.

METHODS. Chicks wore +6 D or +10 D lenses for between 8 and 60 min/d, in two to six periods and wore either no lenses or negative lenses for the remainder of the 12-hour daylight period. Refraction and ultrasound biometry were performed before and after the 3-day-long experiments.

RESULTS. Wearing positive lenses for as little as 12 min/d (six periods of 2 minutes) with unrestricted vision the remainder of the time caused eyes to become hyperopic and reduced the rate of ocular elongation. These effects also occurred when the scene viewed was beyond the far point of the lens-wearing eye and thus was myopically blurred. Even when chicks wore negative lenses for the entire day except for 8 minutes of wearing positive lenses, the eyes compensated for the positive lenses, as though the negative lenses had not been worn. When chicks wore binocular negative lenses for the entire day except for 8 minutes of wearing a positive lens on one eye and a plano lens on the other, the eye wearing the positive lens became less myopic than the eye wearing the plano lens.

CONCLUSIONS. Brief periods of myopic defocus imposed by positive lenses prevent myopia caused by daylong wearing of negative lenses. This implies that periods of myopic and hyperopic defocus do not add linearly. If children are like chicks and if the hyperopic defocus of long daily periods of reading predisposes a child to myopia, regular, brief interruptions of reading might have use as a prophylaxis against progression of myopia.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
X. Zhu and J. Wallman
Temporal Properties of Compensation for Positive and Negative Spectacle Lenses in Chicks
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 37 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C.-s. Kee, L.-F. Hung, Y. Qiao-Grider, R. Ramamirtham, J. Winawer, J. Wallman, and E. L. Smith III
Temporal Constraints on Experimental Emmetropization in Infant Monkeys
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2007; 48(3): 957 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. T. Norton, J. T. Siegwart Jr, and A. O. Amedo
Effectiveness of Hyperopic Defocus, Minimal Defocus, or Myopic Defocus in Competition with a Myopiagenic Stimulus in Tree Shrew Eyes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4687 - 4699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
E. L. Smith III, C.-s. Kee, R. Ramamirtham, Y. Qiao-Grider, and L.-F. Hung
Peripheral Vision Can Influence Eye Growth and Refractive Development in Infant Monkeys
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 3965 - 3972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J R Phillips
Monovision slows juvenile myopia progression unilaterally
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2005; 89(9): 1196 - 1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
X. Zhu, T. W. Park, J. Winawer, and J. Wallman
In a Matter of Minutes, the Eye Can Know Which Way to Grow
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2238 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Diether and C. F. Wildsoet
Stimulus Requirements for the Decoding of Myopic and Hyperopic Defocus under Single and Competing Defocus Conditions in the Chicken
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 2242 - 2252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Buck, F. Schaeffel, P. Simon, and M. Feldkaemper
Effects of Positive and Negative Lens Treatment on Retinal and Choroidal Glucagon and Glucagon Receptor mRNA Levels in the Chicken
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 402 - 409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology