IOVS Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:3226-3232.)
© 2003 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.02-0998

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arden, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arden, G. B.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, J. E.

Differential Effects of Light and Alcohol on the Electro-oculographic Responses of Patients with Age-Related Macular Disease

Geoffrey B. Arden and Janet E. Wolf

From The Applied Vision Research Centre, City University, London, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE. Alcohol (EtOH) affects the electro-oculogram (EOG) in ways very similar to light, although the two agents act on the RPE through different routes. Are the EOGs to light and to alcohol affected similarly in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and age-related maculopathy (ARM)?

METHODS. Standard eye movements and recording of EOGs were used. After 26 minutes of baseline recording in darkness, subjects were either exposed to 30 cd/m2 light or drank 226 mg/kg alcohol (7.1% vol/vol) in water.

RESULTS. In 17 patients with ARM and AMD (aged 67–86 years; mean, 77), the light-EOG was slowed in comparison to normal, and the voltage changes were somewhat reduced. The mean reduction in the alcohol-EOG (EtOH-EOG) was much greater. The reduction was equal in the two eyes, regardless of uniocular foveal impairment. Some EtOH-EOG loss occurred in patients with minor fundus changes and no loss of acuity, but the loss was greater in patients with "wet" or "dry" ARM and AMD. Grading of RPE changes correlated with the decrease in EtOH-EOG responsiveness, but not with light-EOG responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS. EtOH- and light-EOGs are affected differentially. In ARM, even with minor fundus changes, patients appear to have a general abnormality in the RPE. The alcohol response abnormality is correlated to the fundus appearance, but not with age. These results provide further evidence that EtOH acts by a pathway different from that governing the action of light. These results support histologic and other evidence that in ARM there is a functional barrier between the choroid and the RPE-retina.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
G B Arden, R L Sidman, W Arap, and R O Schlingemann
Spare the rod and spoil the eye
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2005; 89(6): 764 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
G B Arden and J E Wolf
Colour vision testing as an aid to diagnosis and management of age related maculopathy
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2004; 88(9): 1180 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology