HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alahyane, N. Articles by Pélisson, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alahyane, N. Articles by Pélisson, D.

Eye Position Specificity of Saccadic Adaptation

From the Institut de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Unité 534, Espace et Action, IFR19 Institut Fédératif des Neurosciences de Lyon, Bron, France.

PURPOSE. The accuracy of saccadic eye movements is maintained throughout life by adaptive mechanisms. With the double-step target paradigm, eight human subjects were investigated to determine whether saccadic adaptation depends only on the eye-displacement vector, or also on eye position as a context cue when two saccades of identical vector are adapted simultaneously.

METHODS. First, bidirectional adaptations (BDAs) of horizontal saccades of the same vector were induced in a single training phase. Each direction of adaptation in BDAs (backward and forward) was linked to one vertical eye position (e.g., forward adaptation performed with the eyes directed 12.5° upward and backward adaptation with the eyes 25° downward) and alternated from trial to trial. Second, unidirectional adaptations (UDAs) were tested in two control conditions in which training trials of a single direction (backward or forward) were presented at both 12.5° and -25° eye elevations.

RESULTS. Opposite changes in saccade amplitude could develop simultaneously in BDA, indicating that saccadic adaptation depends on orbital eye position. Comparing these data with the control conditions further indicated that eye position specificity was complete for backward, but not for forward, adaptation.

CONCLUSIONS. The results indicate that saccadic adaptation mechanisms use vectorial eye displacement signals, but can also take eye position signals into account as a contextual cue when the training involves conflicting saccade amplitude changes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Herman, M. R. Harwood, and J. Wallman Saccade Adaptation Specific to Visual Context J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2009; 101(4): 1713 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Panouilleres, T. Weiss, C. Urquizar, R. Salemme, D. P. Munoz, and D. Pelisson Behavioral Evidence of Separate Adaptation Mechanisms Controlling Saccade Amplitude Lengthening and Shortening J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2009; 101(3): 1550 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Cecala and E. G. Freedman Head-Unrestrained Gaze Adaptation in the Rhesus Macaque J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2009; 101(1): 164 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Alahyane and D. Pelisson Long-lasting modifications of saccadic eye movements following adaptation induced in the double-step target paradigm Learn. Mem., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 433 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Awater, D. Burr, M. Lappe, M. C. Morrone, and M. E. Goldberg Effect of Saccadic Adaptation on Localization of Visual Targets J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3605 - 3614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]