HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stiers, P. Articles by Vandenbussche, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stiers, P. Articles by Vandenbussche, E.

Optotype and Grating Visual Acuity in Patients with Ocular and Cerebral Visual Impairment

¹From the Laboratorium voor Neuropsychologie, K. U. Leuven, Medical School, Leuven, Belgium.

PURPOSE. To investigate the discrepancy between grating and optotype visual acuity in children with visual impairment due to brain and/or ocular abnormalities.

METHODS. Better eye acuity at 114 cm was studied in 81 patients (ages, 5–24 years) attending special schools for the visually handicapped. Fourteen patients had a brain abnormality, 48 had an ocular disorder, and 19 had both. Three acuity tasks were administered: detecting gratings in one of two positions, discriminating the orientation of single gratings, and discriminating the orientation of uncrowded Landolt-C optotypes. The three paradigms were similar in stimulus contrast, luminance, presentation mode, and psychophysical procedure.

RESULTS. Overall, grating acuity was better than optotype acuity, and the disparity increased with poorer optotype acuity. The largest discrepancies occurred in patients with brain abnormality, but disparities were also large in patients with optic nerve disorder. In patients with ocular and brain abnormality, grating acuities were only mildly better and not different from patients with only ocular abnormality. Grating orientation and grating detection tasks yielded similar thresholds, except in patients with cerebral visual impairment and with optic nerve disorder, whose grating detection acuity was better than grating orientation acuity.

CONCLUSIONS. Grating-to-optotype acuity superiority is typically large in visual disorders involving the brain. The closely matched test paradigms point to stimulus characteristics as the explanation. However, because the discrepancy decreased with grating orientation acuity instead of grating detection acuity, the complexity of the response required also plays a role.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. K. VanderVeen, D. K. Coats, V. Dobson, D. Fredrick, R. A. Gordon, R. J. Hardy, D. E. Neely, E. A. Palmer, S. M. Steidl, B. Tung, et al. Prevalence and course of strabismus in the first year of life for infants with prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity: findings from the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity study. Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 2006; 124(6): 766 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]