|
|
||||||||
1From the Department of Surgery (Bioengineering), University of Medicine and Dentistry New Jersey (UMDNJ)-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey; 2MRI Research, Middleburg Heights, Ohio; the 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey; and the 4Laurie Imaging Center, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
PURPOSE. To evaluate the effect of age and accommodation on lens cross-sectional area (CSA).
METHODS. High-resolution magnetic resonance images of the eye were acquired from 25 subjects ranging in age from 22 to 50 years during accommodation and with accommodation at rest. The images were analyzed to obtain the total lens CSA and the CSAs of the anterior and posterior portions of the lens.
RESULTS. The total lens CSA and the CSA of the anterior portion increased with age in both accommodative states. With accommodation, the CSA was larger in these portions of the lens; however, this difference decreased with age. Conversely, the CSA of the posterior portion of the lens remained statistically independent of both age and accommodative state.
CONCLUSIONS. This preliminary study documents, in vivo, that the lens grows with age. This growth appears to be confined to the anterior portion. A quite unexpected finding is that both the total lens CSA and the CSA of the anterior portion are greater during accommodation when zonular tension is minimized. This accommodative change in CSA, which decreases with age, may be due to compression of the lens material during relaxed accommodation when zonular tension is greatest. That both age and accommodative changes in CSA appear to be limited to the anterior portion of the lens may be related to properties of the anterior capsule and lens material, the position of the zonular attachments, and the location of the fetal nucleus.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Wasilewski, J. P. McDonald, G. Heatley, E. Lutjen-Drecoll, P. L. Kaufman, and M. A. Croft Surgical Intervention and Accommodative Responses, II: Forward Ciliary Body Accommodative Movement Is Facilitated by Zonular Attachments to the Lens Capsule Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 5495 - 5502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Zamudio, O. A. Candia, C. W. Kong, B. Wu, and R. Gerometta Surface change of the mammalian lens during accommodation Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): C1430 - C1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Schachar and G. G. Liao Ocular lens does not change volume during accommodation Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): C1727 - C1728. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Candia Reply to "Letter to the editor: 'Ocular lens does not change volume during accommodation'" Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): C1729 - C1730. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gerometta, A. C. Zamudio, D. P. Escobar, and O. A. Candia Volume change of the ocular lens during accommodation Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): C797 - C804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Manns, J.-M. Parel, D. Denham, C. Billotte, N. Ziebarth, D. Borja, V. Fernandez, M. Aly, E. Arrieta, A. Ho, et al. Optomechanical Response of Human and Monkey Lenses in a Lens Stretcher Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3260 - 3268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bernal, J.-M. Parel, and F. Manns Evidence for Posterior Zonular Fiber Attachment on the Anterior Hyaloid Membrane Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4708 - 4713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Singh, N. S. Logan, and B. Gilmartin Three-dimensional modeling of the human eye based on magnetic resonance imaging. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2272 - 2279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Nirmalan, S. Krishnaiah, B. R. Shamanna, G. N. Rao, and R. Thomas A population-based assessment of presbyopia in the state of andhra pradesh, South India: the andhra pradesh eye disease study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2324 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |