IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2004;45:1224-1231.)
© 2004 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.03-0821

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, M. S.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Current and Ion Delivery into the Eye during Transscleral and Transcorneal Iontophoresis

S. Kevin Li,1 Eun-Kee Jeong,2 and Matthew S. Hastings1,3

1From the Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry and the 2Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research (Radiology), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and 3Aciont Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah.

PURPOSE. The objectives were to determine by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the target sites of ion delivery in the eye during iontophoresis, compare transscleral and transcorneal ocular iontophoresis, and monitor the distribution of a probe ion in the anterior chamber and vitreous after iontophoretic delivery.

METHODS. Thirty-minute 2-mA anodal constant current transscleral and transcorneal iontophoresis (current density, 10 mA/cm2) was performed on three New Zealand White rabbits in vivo. Intravitreal injection and passive delivery were the controls. Transscleral and transcorneal iontophoresis experiments were conducted with the electrode device placed in the superior cul-de-sac away from the limbus and on the cornea adjacent to the limbus, respectively. During iontophoresis, the current delivered into the eye was monitored using a probe ion (Mn2+) with MRI. The distributions of the ion in the aqueous and vitreous humor after iontophoresis, passive delivery, and intravitreal injection were also determined by MRI.

RESULTS. With the short application time, passive diffusion did not deliver a significant amount of the ion into the eye. Whereas transscleral iontophoresis delivered the ion into the vitreous, transcorneal iontophoresis delivered the ion into the anterior chamber. The current pathways during iontophoresis were mainly from the electrode into the eye, perpendicular to the electrode–eye interface beneath the electrode. Electric current along the surface of the globe was relatively minimal. With the present transscleral iontophoresis protocol, the ion penetrated the sclera and traveled as far as 1.5 mm from the electrode–conjunctiva interface into the vitreous. For transcorneal iontophoresis, the ion penetrated the cornea and filled the entire anterior chamber.

CONCLUSIONS. MRI can be a useful technique in the study of the penetration of probe compounds in the eye during and after iontophoresis, such as in iontophoresis protocol and device testing. Ocular pharmacokinetic studies using MRI are noninvasive and provide real-time data without perturbation and compound redistribution that can occur during dissection and assay in traditional pharmacokinetic studies. With MRI, it was shown that transscleral iontophoresis, transcorneal iontophoresis, and intravitreal injection deliver ions to different parts of the eye.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
H. F. Edelhauser, J. H. Boatright, J. M. Nickerson, and the Third ARVO/Pfizer Research Institute Working G
Drug Delivery to Posterior Intraocular Tissues: Third Annual ARVO/Pfizer Ophthalmics Research Institute Conference
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 4712 - 4720.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. G. Ghosn, V. V. Tuchin, and K. V. Larin
Nondestructive Quantification of Analyte Diffusion in Cornea and Sclera Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2007; 48(6): 2726 - 2733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. A. Berkowitz, R. Roberts, D. J. Goebel, and H. Luan
Noninvasive and simultaneous imaging of layer-specific retinal functional adaptation by manganese-enhanced MRI.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2668 - 2674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. Herberholz, C. J. Mims, X. Zhang, X. Hu, and D. H. Edwards
Anatomy of a live invertebrate revealed by manganese-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2004; 207(26): 4543 - 4550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology