IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2004;45:2613-2618.)
© 2004 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.03-1274

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Budde, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jonas, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Budde, W. M.

Predictive Factors of the Optic Nerve Head for Development or Progression of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss

Jost B. Jonas,12 Peter Martus,3 Folkert K. Horn,1 Anselm Jünemann,1 Mathias Korth,1 and Wido M. Budde12

1From the Department of Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; the 2Department of Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Faculty of Clinical Medicine Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; and the 3Institute of Medical Informatics, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, Benjamin Franklin School of Medicine, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

PURPOSE. To evaluate which morphologic features of the optic disc are predictive factors for the development or progression of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS. The prospective observational clinical study included 763 eyes of 416 white subjects with ocular hypertension and chronic open-angle glaucoma. During the follow-up time (mean, 67.4 months; median, 65.1; range, 6.2–104.5), all patients underwent repeated qualitative and morphometric evaluation of color stereo optic disc photographs and white-on-white visual field examination. Progression of glaucomatous visual field damage was defined by point-wise regression analysis for each of the 59 locations in the visual field. Outcome measures were qualitative and quantitative morphologic optic nerve head parameters.

RESULTS. Development or progression of glaucomatous visual field defects was detected in 106 (13.9%) eyes. At baseline of the study, neuroretinal rim area was significantly (P < 0.002) smaller, the beta zone of parapapillary atrophy (P < 0.003, nasal sector) was significantly larger, and age was significantly higher (P < 0.003) in the progressive study group than in the nonprogressive study group. Both study groups did not vary significantly in size of the optic disc and the alpha zone of parapapillary atrophy. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that the progression of glaucomatous visual field loss depended significantly on the area of the neuroretinal rim (P < 0.001) and age (P < 0.001), but was independent of diameter of the retinal arterioles and veins.

CONCLUSIONS. Morphologic predictive factors for development or progression of glaucomatous visual field defects in whites are small neuroretinal rim area and large beta zone of parapapillary atrophy. Age is an additional nonmorphologic parameter. Progression of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes is independent of the size of the optic disc and {alpha}-zone of parapapillary atrophy and retinal vessel diameter.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
P. Healey, F. Carbonaro, B. Taylor, T. D. Spector, P. Mitchell, and C. J. Hammond
The Heritability of Optic Disc Parameters: A Classic Twin Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 77 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. L. Bennett, A. W. Hewitt, J. L. Poulsen, L. S. Kearns, J. E. Morgan, J. E. Craig, and D. A. Mackey
Screening for Glaucomatous Disc Changes Prior to Diagnosis of Glaucoma in Myocilin Pedigrees
Arch Ophthalmol, January 1, 2007; 125(1): 112 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
C Oliveira, N Harizman, C A Girkin, A Xie, C Tello, J M Liebmann, and R Ritch
Axial length and optic disc size in normal eyes
Br J Ophthalmol, January 1, 2007; 91(1): 37 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
D. B. Henson and S. Shambhu
Relative Risk of Progressive Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss in Patients Enrolled and Not Enrolled in a Prospective Longitudinal Study
Arch Ophthalmol, October 1, 2006; 124(10): 1405 - 1408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Manassakorn, K. Nouri-Mahdavi, B. Koucheki, S. K. Law, and J. Caprioli
Pointwise Linear Regression Analysis for Detection of Visual Field Progression with Absolute versus Corrected Threshold Sensitivities.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 2896 - 2903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology