IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2004;45:2722-2731.)
© 2004 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-0091

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.
Right arrow Articles by Csaky, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, H.
Right arrow Articles by Csaky, K. G.

Controlled Drug Release from an Ocular Implant: An Evaluation Using Dynamic Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hyuncheol Kim,1,2 Michael R. Robinson,3 Martin J. Lizak,4 Ginger Tansey,3 Robert J. Lutz,1 Peng Yuan,5 Nam S. Wang,2 and Karl G. Csaky3

1From the Divison of Bioengineering and Physical Sciences, Office of Research Services; 3National Eye Institute; the 4MRI Research Facility, National Institute of Neurological Disease and Strokes; and the 5Pharmacy Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and the 2Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.

PURPOSE. The ability of an episcleral implant at the equator of the eye to deliver drugs to the posterior segment was evaluated, using a sustained-release implant containing gadolinium-DTPA (Gd-DTPA). The movement of this drug surrogate was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the rabbit eye. The results were compared with a similar implant placed in the vitreous cavity through a scleral incision at the equator.

METHODS. Polymer-based implants releasing Gd-DTPA were manufactured and placed in the subconjunctival space on the episclera or in the vitreous cavity in live rabbit eyes (in vivo) and in freshly enucleated eyes (ex vivo). Release rates of implants in vitro were also determined. Dynamic three-dimensional MRI was performed using a 4.7-Tesla MRI system for 8 hours. MR images were developed and analyzed on computer.

RESULTS. Episcleral implants in vivo delivered a mean total of 2.7 µg Gd-DTPA into the vitreous, representing only 0.12% of the total amount of compound released from the implant in vitro. No Gd-DTPA was detected in the posterior segment of the eye. Ex vivo, the Gd-DTPA concentration in the vitreous was 30 times higher. In vivo eyes with intravitreal implants placed at the equator delivered Gd-DTPA throughout the vitreous cavity and posterior segment. Compartmental analysis of the ocular drug distribution from an episcleral implant showed that the elimination rate constant of Gd-DTPA from the subconjunctival space into the episcleral veins and conjunctival lymphatics was 3-log units higher than the transport rate constant for Gd-DTPA movement into the vitreous.

CONCLUSIONS. In vivo, episcleral implants at the equator of the eye did not deliver a significant amount of Gd-DTPA into the vitreous, and no compound was identified in the posterior segment. A 30-fold increase in vitreous Gd-DTPA concentration occurred in the enucleated eyes, suggesting that there are significant barriers to the movement of drugs from the episcleral space into the vitreous in vivo. Dynamic three-dimensional MRI using Gd-DTPA, and possibly other contrast agents, may be useful in understanding the spatial relationships of ocular drug distribution and clearance mechanisms in the eye.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. J. Lee, E. S. Kim, D. H. Geroski, B. E. McCarey, and H. F. Edelhauser
Pharmacokinetics of Intraocular Drug Delivery of Oregon Green 488-Labeled Triamcinolone by Subtenon Injection Using Ocular Fluorophotometry in Rabbit Eyes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4506 - 4514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. C. Amrite, H. F. Edelhauser, and U. B. Kompella
Modeling of Corneal and Retinal Pharmacokinetics after Periocular Drug Administration
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 320 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. S. Lee, H. Kim, N. S. Wang, P. M. Bungay, B. C. Gilger, P. Yuan, J. Kim, K. G. Csaky, and M. R. Robinson
A Pharmacokinetic and Safety Evaluation of an Episcleral Cyclosporine Implant for Potential Use in High-Risk Keratoplasty Rejection
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 2023 - 2029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
D. Ghate, W. Brooks, B. E. McCarey, and H. F. Edelhauser
Pharmacokinetics of Intraocular Drug Delivery by Periocular Injections Using Ocular Fluorophotometry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 2230 - 2237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. D. Lindsey, J. G. Crowston, A. Tran, C. Morris, and R. N. Weinreb
Direct Matrix Metalloproteinase Enhancement of Transscleral Permeability
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 752 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. H. Kim, C. J. Galban, R. J. Lutz, R. L. Dedrick, K. G. Csaky, M. J. Lizak, N. S. Wang, G. Tansey, and M. R. Robinson
Assessment of Subconjunctival and Intrascleral Drug Delivery to the Posterior Segment Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 808 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. A. Pontes de Carvalho, M. L. Krausse, A. L. Murphree, E. E. Schmitt, P. A. Campochiaro, and I. H. Maumenee
Delivery from episcleral exoplants.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 4532 - 4539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
L. P. J. Cruysberg, R. M. M. A. Nuijts, D. H. Geroski, J. A. Gilbert, F. Hendrikse, and H. F. Edelhauser
The Influence of Intraocular Pressure on the Transscleral Diffusion of High-Molecular-Weight Compounds
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3790 - 3794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
H. Kim, K. G. Csaky, B. C. Gilger, J. P. Dunn, S. S. Lee, M. Tremblay, F. de Monasterio, G. Tansey, P. Yuan, P. M. Bungay, et al.
Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Episcleral Cyclosporine Implant for Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2005; 46(2): 655 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology