IOVS Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2004;45:2856-2860.)
© 2004 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0878

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, C.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hsu, W.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, C.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hsu, W.-M.

Association of Ocular Dominance and Anisometropic Myopia

Ching-Yu Cheng,1,2,3,4 May-Yung Yen,1,2 Hsin-Yi Lin,2 Wei-Wei Hsia,2 and Wen-Ming Hsu1,2

1From the Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the 2Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the 3Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; and the 4Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

PURPOSE. To determine the association between ocular dominance and degree of myopia in patients with anisometropia.

METHODS. Fifty-five subjects with anisometropic myopia were recruited. None of them had amblyopia. Refractive error and axial length were measured in each subject. Ocular dominance was determined using the hole-in-the-card test and convergence near-point test.

RESULTS. There was a threshold level of anisometropia (1.75 D) beyond which the dominant eye was always more myopic than the nondominant eye. Of the 33 subjects with anisometropia of ≤1.75 D, the dominant eye was more myopic in 17 (51.5%) subjects. Dominant eyes, determined by the hole-in-the-card test, had a significantly greater myopic spherical equivalent (–5.27 ± 2.45 D) than nondominant eyes (–3.94 ± 3.10 D; P < 0.001). Dominant eyes also had a longer axial length than nondominant eyes (25.15 ± 0.96 mm vs. 24.69 ± 1.17 mm, respectively; P < 0.001). The difference was more evident in those subjects with higher anisometropia (>1.75 D), but was not significant in those with lower anisometropia (≤1.75 D). Similar results were obtained using the convergence near-point test.

CONCLUSIONS. The present study shows that the dominant eye has a greater degree of myopia than the nondominant eye in subjects with anisometropic myopia. Taking ocular dominance into account in the design of randomized clinical trails to assess the efficacy of myopia interventions may provide useful information.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
Z. Yang, W. Lan, W. Liu, X. Chen, H. Nie, M. Yu, and J. Ge
Association of Ocular Dominance and Myopia Development: A 2-Year Longitudinal Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2008; 49(11): 4779 - 4783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Chia, A. Jaurigue, G. Gazzard, Y. Wang, D. Tan, R. A. Stone, and S. M. Saw
Ocular Dominance, Laterality, and Refraction in Singaporean Children
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2007; 48(8): 3533 - 3536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology