IOVS Journal of Nutrition
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:46-50.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.03-0915

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mertzanis, P.
Right arrow Articles by Begley, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mertzanis, P.
Right arrow Articles by Begley, C.

The Relative Burden of Dry Eye in Patients’ Lives: Comparisons to a U.S. Normative Sample

Polyxane Mertzanis,1 Linda Abetz,2 Krithika Rajagopalan,3,4 Derek Espindle,1 Robin Chalmers,5 Christopher Snyder,6 Barbara Caffery,7 Timothy Edrington,8 Trefford Simpson,9 J. Daniel Nelson,10 and Carolyn Begley11

1From Mapi Values, Boston, Massachusetts; 2Mapi Values, Cheshire, United Kingdom; 3Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas; 5Clinical Trial Consultant, Atlanta, Georgia; the 6University of Alabama, School of Optometry, Birmingham, Alabama; 7Private Practice, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 8Southern California College of Optometry, Fullerton, California; the 9University of Waterloo, School of Optometry, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; the 10University of Minnesota, School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and 11Indiana University, School of Optometry, Bloomington, Indiana.

PURPOSE. To assess the relative burden of dry eye in daily life by comparing Short Form-36 (SF-36) responses from individuals with and without dry eye against U.S. norms.

METHODS. Assessment of 210 people, 130 with non-Sjögren’s keratoconjunctivitis sicca (non-SS KCS), 32 with Sjögren’s Syndrome (SS), and 48 control subjects. The study population data and published normative SF-36 data were compared. Dry eye severity was assessed by recruited severity (control, non-SS KCS, SS), patient self-report (none, very mild/mild, moderate, severe/extremely severe), and clinician-report (none, mild, moderate, severe). Age- and gender-matched norms were compared with all defined severity groups.

RESULTS. Compared with the norms, control subjects scored higher on all SF-36 scales. Effect size (ES) ranged from 0.15 to 0.52. Non-SS KCS patients had lower Role-Physical (ES = –0.07), Bodily Pain (ES = –0.08), and Vitality (ES = –0.11) scores, indicating more dry eye impact on those areas versus the norm. All SF-36 scale scores except Mental Health (ES = 0.12) were lower in the SS group than the adjusted norm (ES range: –0.16 to –0.99). Regardless of severity classification, mild patients consistently had lower Role-Physical and Bodily Pain scores than the norm, suggesting impact on daily roles (ES < 0.2). Patients with moderately severe disease also experienced less vitality and poorer general health. The group with severe disease scored lower than the norm across all domains (ES range: –0.14 to –0.91) except Role-Emotional (ES = 0.13) and Mental Health (ES = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS. These results indicate dry eye’s negative impact on everyday life, particularly in daily activities. Further research using disease-specific measures to examine dry eye’s impact is underway.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Narayanan, W. L. Miller, and A. M. McDermott
Conjunctival cytokine expression in symptomatic moderate dry eye subjects.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 2445 - 2450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology