IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:3684-3692.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-1168

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sample, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Goldbaum, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sample, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Goldbaum, M.

Unsupervised Machine Learning with Independent Component Analysis to Identify Areas of Progression in Glaucomatous Visual Fields

Pamela A. Sample,1 Catherine Boden,1 Zuohua Zhang,2,3 John Pascual,1 Te-Won Lee,3 Linda M. Zangwill,4 Robert N. Weinreb,4 Jonathan G. Crowston,4 Esther M. Hoffmann,4 Felipe A. Medeiros,4 Terrence Sejnowski,5 and Michael Goldbaum2

1From the Visual Function and 2Ophthalmic Informatics Laboratories, the 4Hamilton Glaucoma Center, and the 3Institute for Neural Computation, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; and 5The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California.

PURPOSE. To determine whether a variational Bayesian independent component analysis mixture model (vB-ICA-mm), a form of unsupervised machine learning, can be used to identify and quantify areas of progression in standard automated perimetry fields.

METHODS. In an earlier study, it was shown that a model using vB-ICA-mm can separate normal fields from fields with six different patterns of visual field loss related to glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) along maximally independent axes. In the present study, an independent group of 191 patient eyes (66 with ocular hypertension (OHT), 12 with suspected glaucoma by field, 61 with suspected glaucoma by disc, and 52 with glaucoma) with five or more standard visual fields under observation for a mean of 6.24 ± 2.65 years and 8.11 ± 2.42 visual fields were evaluated with the vB-ICA-mm. In addition, eyes with progressive GON (PGON) were identified (n = 39). Each participant had a series of fields tested, with each field entered independently and placed along the axes of the previously developed model. This allowed change in one pattern of visual field defect (along one axis) to be assessed relative to results other areas of that same field (no change along other axes). Progression was based on a slope falling outside the 5th and the 95th percentile limits of all slopes, with at least two axes not showing such a deviation in a given individual’s series of fields. Fields were also scored using Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) and the Early Manifest Glaucoma Treatment Trial (EMGT) criteria.

RESULTS. Thirty-two of 191 eyes progressed on vB-ICA-mm by this definition. Of the 32, 22 had field loss at baseline, 7 had only GON, 3 were OHTs and 12 were from the 39 eyes (31%) with PGON. The vB-ICA-mm identified a higher percentage of progressing eyes in each diagnostic category than did AGIS or and the EMGT.

CONCLUSIONS. The vB-ICA-mm can quantitatively identify progression in eyes with glaucoma by evaluating change in one or more patterns of the visual field loss while other areas or patterns remain stable. This may enable each eye to contribute to the determination of whether change is caused by true progression or by variability.





This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Boden, K. Chan, P. A. Sample, J. Hao, T.-W. Lee, L. M. Zangwill, R. N. Weinreb, and M. H. Goldbaum
Assessing Visual Field Clustering Schemes Using Machine Learning Classifiers in Standard Perimetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5582 - 5590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. P. Pascual, U. Schiefer, J. Paetzold, L. M. Zangwill, I. M. Tavares, R. N. Weinreb, and P. A. Sample
Spatial Characteristics of Visual Field Progression Determined by Monte Carlo Simulation: Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1642 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. G. Strouthidis, A. Scott, N. M. Peter, and D. F. Garway-Heath
Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 2904 - 2910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. H. Goldbaum, P. A. Sample, Z. Zhang, K. Chan, J. Hao, T.-W. Lee, C. Boden, C. Bowd, R. Bourne, L. Zangwill, et al.
Using Unsupervised Learning with Independent Component Analysis to Identify Patterns of Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3676 - 3683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology